Does nutrition-sensitive social protection build longer-term resilience? Experimental evidence from Bangladesh
Evidence shows that cash and in-kind transfer programs increase food security while interventions are ongoing, including during or immediately after shocks. But less is known about whether receipt of these programs can have protective effects for household food security against shocks that occur sev...
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo preliminar |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/155053 |
Ejemplares similares: Does nutrition-sensitive social protection build longer-term resilience? Experimental evidence from Bangladesh
- Did prior receipt of nutrition-sensitive social protection build resilience to COVID-19 in rural Bangladesh?
- COVID-19 and rural livelihoods: Lessons from a longer-term assessment and the path to recovery
- Replication Data for "COVID-19 and Rural Livelihoods: Lessons from a Longer-Term Assessment in Guatemala"
- Gender, nutrition-sensitive agricultural interventions, and resilience: Evidence from rural Bangladesh
- Private transfers, public transfers, and food insecurity during the time of COVID-19: Evidence from Bangladesh
- Private transfers, public transfers, and foodinsecurity during the time of COVID-19: Evidence from Bangladesh