Institutional options for managing rangelands
Rangelands occupy nearly one-half of the Earth's land area or around 16 billion acres. About one-half of this area is used for grazing livestock. Rangelands have been subject to a wide range of tenure arrangements, with different structures for regulating access to, use of, and management of rangela...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book Chapter |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2010
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/154585 |
| _version_ | 1855523779783950336 |
|---|---|
| author | CGIAR Program on Collective Action and Property Rights |
| author_browse | CGIAR Program on Collective Action and Property Rights |
| author_facet | CGIAR Program on Collective Action and Property Rights |
| author_sort | CGIAR Program on Collective Action and Property Rights |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Rangelands occupy nearly one-half of the Earth's land area or around 16 billion acres. About one-half of this area is used for grazing livestock. Rangelands have been subject to a wide range of tenure arrangements, with different structures for regulating access to, use of, and management of rangelands. These include many customary and tribal institutional arrangements that have functioned for long periods. Each of these property rights regimes and institutional options is associated with different costs for achieving various goals, such as poverty reduction, equitable access to resources, and sustainable use and management of those resources. The benefits and costs of alternative tenure and institutional arrangements and the impact of existing legal and policy frameworks on the sustainability and equity of pastoral production systems vary depending on the category of land ownership: state ownership; individual ownership; or common property |
| format | Book Chapter |
| id | CGSpace154585 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publishDateRange | 2010 |
| publishDateSort | 2010 |
| publisher | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| publisherStr | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1545852025-02-24T06:49:02Z Institutional options for managing rangelands CGIAR Program on Collective Action and Property Rights sustainable development goals property rights capacity development Rangelands occupy nearly one-half of the Earth's land area or around 16 billion acres. About one-half of this area is used for grazing livestock. Rangelands have been subject to a wide range of tenure arrangements, with different structures for regulating access to, use of, and management of rangelands. These include many customary and tribal institutional arrangements that have functioned for long periods. Each of these property rights regimes and institutional options is associated with different costs for achieving various goals, such as poverty reduction, equitable access to resources, and sustainable use and management of those resources. The benefits and costs of alternative tenure and institutional arrangements and the impact of existing legal and policy frameworks on the sustainability and equity of pastoral production systems vary depending on the category of land ownership: state ownership; individual ownership; or common property 2010 2024-10-01T14:02:28Z 2024-10-01T14:02:28Z Book Chapter https://hdl.handle.net/10568/154585 en https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133794 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/34935 Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute CGIAR Program on Collective Action and Property Rights (CAPRi). 2010. Institutional options for managing rangelands. In Resources, rights, and cooperation: A sourcebook on property rights and collective action for sustainable development, CGIAR Program on Collective Action and Property Rights (CAPRi). Property Rights and Collective Action for Natural Resource Management, Chapter 3, Pp. 93-98. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/154585 |
| spellingShingle | sustainable development goals property rights capacity development CGIAR Program on Collective Action and Property Rights Institutional options for managing rangelands |
| title | Institutional options for managing rangelands |
| title_full | Institutional options for managing rangelands |
| title_fullStr | Institutional options for managing rangelands |
| title_full_unstemmed | Institutional options for managing rangelands |
| title_short | Institutional options for managing rangelands |
| title_sort | institutional options for managing rangelands |
| topic | sustainable development goals property rights capacity development |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/154585 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT cgiarprogramoncollectiveactionandpropertyrights institutionaloptionsformanagingrangelands |