Decentralization of public-sector agricultural extension in India: The case of the district-level Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA)

In an effort to increase the impact of extension on agricultural and pro-poor growth in developing countries, public-sector agricultural extension systems around the globe are implementing reforms that include demand-driven and decentralized approaches. Such reforms attempt to increase the accountab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Glendenning, Claire J., Babu, Suresh Chandra
Format: Artículo preliminar
Language:Inglés
Published: International Food Policy Research Institute 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/154244
_version_ 1855516261229789184
author Glendenning, Claire J.
Babu, Suresh Chandra
author_browse Babu, Suresh Chandra
Glendenning, Claire J.
author_facet Glendenning, Claire J.
Babu, Suresh Chandra
author_sort Glendenning, Claire J.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description In an effort to increase the impact of extension on agricultural and pro-poor growth in developing countries, public-sector agricultural extension systems around the globe are implementing reforms that include demand-driven and decentralized approaches. Such reforms attempt to increase the accountability of agricultural extension staff to their clients (the farmers) and increase the relevance of extension activities. India is no exception to these trends and has implemented a number of programs to revitalize the public-sector agricultural extension system in the last decade. One such initiative is a central project called Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA). The district-level ATMA project is often highlighted as an innovative model of public-sector agricultural extension involving decentralization as well as participatory and bottom-up approaches. ATMA represents a unique institutional platform that aims to integrate at the district level the weakly linked research and administration arms of public-sector agricultural extension in India. Since the pilot study in 28 districts of India from 1998 to 2003, ATMA has been scaled up to all 591 development districts of India over the five years from 2005 to 2010. Despite empirical impact studies of the ATMA pilot, there is very little evidence of impacts of ATMA post-pilot, but national implementation of ATMA has been varied. A June 2010 revision has attempted to address the constraints the project has experienced over the past five years. This paper examines the evolution and spread of ATMA over the last decade and considers some of the challenges of national implementation of a decentralized process in the public-sector extension system of India. Using primary and secondary sources, in addition to interviews and discussions gathered at a recent national workshop, this paper examines whether the inherent organizational capacity, culture, and management within the public-sector extension system has been addressed by ATMA during the pilot period, during the national scale-up, and now under the revision guidelines. Using an organizational capacity framework, the paper concludes that despite the ambitions of the program, the inherent capacity and culture of public-sector agricultural extension in India, where limited organizational learning from implementation process is taking place, limits the ability of ATMA to fulfill its original objectives.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace154244
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2011
publishDateRange 2011
publishDateSort 2011
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1542442025-11-06T05:20:05Z Decentralization of public-sector agricultural extension in India: The case of the district-level Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA) Glendenning, Claire J. Babu, Suresh Chandra agricultural extension decentralization In an effort to increase the impact of extension on agricultural and pro-poor growth in developing countries, public-sector agricultural extension systems around the globe are implementing reforms that include demand-driven and decentralized approaches. Such reforms attempt to increase the accountability of agricultural extension staff to their clients (the farmers) and increase the relevance of extension activities. India is no exception to these trends and has implemented a number of programs to revitalize the public-sector agricultural extension system in the last decade. One such initiative is a central project called Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA). The district-level ATMA project is often highlighted as an innovative model of public-sector agricultural extension involving decentralization as well as participatory and bottom-up approaches. ATMA represents a unique institutional platform that aims to integrate at the district level the weakly linked research and administration arms of public-sector agricultural extension in India. Since the pilot study in 28 districts of India from 1998 to 2003, ATMA has been scaled up to all 591 development districts of India over the five years from 2005 to 2010. Despite empirical impact studies of the ATMA pilot, there is very little evidence of impacts of ATMA post-pilot, but national implementation of ATMA has been varied. A June 2010 revision has attempted to address the constraints the project has experienced over the past five years. This paper examines the evolution and spread of ATMA over the last decade and considers some of the challenges of national implementation of a decentralized process in the public-sector extension system of India. Using primary and secondary sources, in addition to interviews and discussions gathered at a recent national workshop, this paper examines whether the inherent organizational capacity, culture, and management within the public-sector extension system has been addressed by ATMA during the pilot period, during the national scale-up, and now under the revision guidelines. Using an organizational capacity framework, the paper concludes that despite the ambitions of the program, the inherent capacity and culture of public-sector agricultural extension in India, where limited organizational learning from implementation process is taking place, limits the ability of ATMA to fulfill its original objectives. 2011 2024-10-01T14:00:25Z 2024-10-01T14:00:25Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/154244 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Glendenning, Claire J.; Babu, Suresh Chandra. 2011. Decentralization of public-sector agricultural extension in India: The case of the district-level Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA). IFPRI Discussion Paper 1067. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/154244
spellingShingle agricultural extension
decentralization
Glendenning, Claire J.
Babu, Suresh Chandra
Decentralization of public-sector agricultural extension in India: The case of the district-level Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA)
title Decentralization of public-sector agricultural extension in India: The case of the district-level Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA)
title_full Decentralization of public-sector agricultural extension in India: The case of the district-level Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA)
title_fullStr Decentralization of public-sector agricultural extension in India: The case of the district-level Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA)
title_full_unstemmed Decentralization of public-sector agricultural extension in India: The case of the district-level Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA)
title_short Decentralization of public-sector agricultural extension in India: The case of the district-level Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA)
title_sort decentralization of public sector agricultural extension in india the case of the district level agricultural technology management agency atma
topic agricultural extension
decentralization
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/154244
work_keys_str_mv AT glendenningclairej decentralizationofpublicsectoragriculturalextensioninindiathecaseofthedistrictlevelagriculturaltechnologymanagementagencyatma
AT babusureshchandra decentralizationofpublicsectoragriculturalextensioninindiathecaseofthedistrictlevelagriculturaltechnologymanagementagencyatma