Gender differences in access to extension services and agricultural productivity

This paper contributes new empirical evidence and nuanced analysis on the gender difference in access to extension services and how this translates to observed differences in technology adoption and agricultural productivity. We employ a cross-sectional instrumental-variable regression method using...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ragasa, Catherine, Berhane, Guush, Tadesse, Fanaye, Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum
Format: Artículo preliminar
Language:Inglés
Published: International Food Policy Research Institute 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/154121
_version_ 1855521478191087616
author Ragasa, Catherine
Berhane, Guush
Tadesse, Fanaye
Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum
author_browse Berhane, Guush
Ragasa, Catherine
Tadesse, Fanaye
Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum
author_facet Ragasa, Catherine
Berhane, Guush
Tadesse, Fanaye
Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum
author_sort Ragasa, Catherine
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This paper contributes new empirical evidence and nuanced analysis on the gender difference in access to extension services and how this translates to observed differences in technology adoption and agricultural productivity. We employ a cross-sectional instrumental-variable regression method using a regionally-representative dataset of more than 7,500 households and 32,000 plots in four major regions in Ethiopia that was collected during the 2010 main season. Results suggest that female heads of households and plot managers are less likely to get extension services and less likely to access quality services than their male counterparts after controlling for plot, household, and village level characteristics. Receiving advice from DAs is strongly and positively related to adoption of improved seed and fertilizer for both females and males, as hypothesized. However, beyond their influence through fertilizer and improved seed use, visits by or advice from DAs are not significant in all productivity models estimated for females and males, which is in contrast to past studies. In some crop-specific productivity models estimated, it is the perceived quality of DA visits and access to radio that appear to be strongly and positively significant in explaining productivity levels for both female and male farmers. Our results highlight the need for productivity models that are stratified by gender and crop.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace154121
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2012
publishDateRange 2012
publishDateSort 2012
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1541212025-11-06T05:50:45Z Gender differences in access to extension services and agricultural productivity Ragasa, Catherine Berhane, Guush Tadesse, Fanaye Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum technology adoption farm inputs methods gender extension agricultural productivity households agricultural extension This paper contributes new empirical evidence and nuanced analysis on the gender difference in access to extension services and how this translates to observed differences in technology adoption and agricultural productivity. We employ a cross-sectional instrumental-variable regression method using a regionally-representative dataset of more than 7,500 households and 32,000 plots in four major regions in Ethiopia that was collected during the 2010 main season. Results suggest that female heads of households and plot managers are less likely to get extension services and less likely to access quality services than their male counterparts after controlling for plot, household, and village level characteristics. Receiving advice from DAs is strongly and positively related to adoption of improved seed and fertilizer for both females and males, as hypothesized. However, beyond their influence through fertilizer and improved seed use, visits by or advice from DAs are not significant in all productivity models estimated for females and males, which is in contrast to past studies. In some crop-specific productivity models estimated, it is the perceived quality of DA visits and access to radio that appear to be strongly and positively significant in explaining productivity levels for both female and male farmers. Our results highlight the need for productivity models that are stratified by gender and crop. 2012 2024-10-01T13:59:37Z 2024-10-01T13:59:37Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/154121 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Ethiopian Development Research Institute Ragasa, Catherine; Berhane, Guush; Tadesse, Fanaye; Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum 2012. Gender differences in access to extension services and agricultural productivity. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/154121
spellingShingle technology adoption
farm inputs
methods
gender
extension
agricultural productivity
households
agricultural extension
Ragasa, Catherine
Berhane, Guush
Tadesse, Fanaye
Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum
Gender differences in access to extension services and agricultural productivity
title Gender differences in access to extension services and agricultural productivity
title_full Gender differences in access to extension services and agricultural productivity
title_fullStr Gender differences in access to extension services and agricultural productivity
title_full_unstemmed Gender differences in access to extension services and agricultural productivity
title_short Gender differences in access to extension services and agricultural productivity
title_sort gender differences in access to extension services and agricultural productivity
topic technology adoption
farm inputs
methods
gender
extension
agricultural productivity
households
agricultural extension
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/154121
work_keys_str_mv AT ragasacatherine genderdifferencesinaccesstoextensionservicesandagriculturalproductivity
AT berhaneguush genderdifferencesinaccesstoextensionservicesandagriculturalproductivity
AT tadessefanaye genderdifferencesinaccesstoextensionservicesandagriculturalproductivity
AT taffessealemayehuseyoum genderdifferencesinaccesstoextensionservicesandagriculturalproductivity