Exit strategies for and potential alternatives to agricultural subsidy programs
Removing subsidies that have been applied to agricultural inputs and closing down subsidy programs, once introduced, have proved difficult to do in many countries, whether the subsidies are for irrigation1, seed2, or fertilizer.3 Long‐running subsidy programs inflate the fiscal burden that governme...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Brief |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés Portugués |
| Publicado: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/154038 |
Ejemplares similares: Exit strategies for and potential alternatives to agricultural subsidy programs
- Monitoring and evaluation of agricultural subsidy programs
- Instruments to target agricultural subsidies to desired beneficiaries
- Agricultural inputs subsidy and their developmental impact: Conventional wisdom
- The impact of alternative input subsidy exit strategies on Malawi’s maize commodity market
- Impact of fertilizer subsidies on the commercial fertilizer sector in Nigeria: Evidence from previous fertilizer subsidy schemes
- Impact of fertilizer subsidies on the commercial fertilizer sector in Nigeria: Evidence from previous fertilizer subsidy schemes