Comment on “Indirect land use change for biofuels: Testing predictions and improving analytical methodologies” by Kim and Dale: Statistical reliability and the definition of the indirect land use change (iLUC) issue
Indirect land use change for biofuels: Testing predictions and improving analytical methodologies" by S. Kim and B. Dale [1], presents a principal inference not supported by its results, that rests on a fundamental conceptual error, and that has no place in the current discussion of biofuels' climat...
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier
2011
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/153958 |
Ejemplares similares: Comment on “Indirect land use change for biofuels: Testing predictions and improving analytical methodologies” by Kim and Dale: Statistical reliability and the definition of the indirect land use change (iLUC) issue
- Combining empirical and theory-based land-use modelling approaches to assess economic potential of biofuel production avoiding iLUC: Argentina as a case study
- Indirect land use change debate: What did we learn?
- Sensitivity of carbon emission estimates from indirect land-use change
- Progress in estimates of ILUC with MIRAGE model
- Indirect economic impacts of dams
- Assessing ILUC Emissions in EU biofuels legislation: EC-JRC and IFPRI collaboration