Targeted Subsidies and Private Market Participation: An Assessment of Fertilizer Demand in Nigeria

Though input vouchers are being publicized as a mechanism to simultaneously target subsidies and develop demand in private markets, limited empirical evidence of their effect on private input demand exists. Few empirical studies, if any, exist on the effect of targeted subsidies on private input dem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O.
Format: Artículo preliminar
Language:Inglés
Published: International Food Policy Research Institute 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/153935
_version_ 1855535600905486336
author Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O.
author_browse Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O.
author_facet Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O.
author_sort Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Though input vouchers are being publicized as a mechanism to simultaneously target subsidies and develop demand in private markets, limited empirical evidence of their effect on private input demand exists. Few empirical studies, if any, exist on the effect of targeted subsidies on private input demand in Nigeria or West Africa . Consequently this study begins to fill this gap by estimating the effect of a targeted input subsidy on farmer participation in the private fertilizer market in Nigeria. Using a double hurdle model and a control function approach, this study explores the effect of increasing access to subsidized fertilizer on farmer participation in the private fertilizer market in Kano, Nigeria. The study finds evidence that farmers who received subsidized fertilizer in 2009 tended to have less assets than their counterparts who did not. Within this context, although receiving subsidized fertilizer did not appear to increase the probability of participating in the private fertilizer market, it did increase the quantity of fertilizer purchased from the private market once the decision to participate had been made. It appears that one benefit of the voucher program was that it developed links between rural farmers and input suppliers. Furthermore, where private fertilizer markets are weak, results indicate that there could be significant gains from the temporary use of voucher programs to create links between input suppliers and farmers.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace153935
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2012
publishDateRange 2012
publishDateSort 2012
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1539352025-11-06T07:17:16Z Targeted Subsidies and Private Market Participation: An Assessment of Fertilizer Demand in Nigeria Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O. subsidies fertilizers demand market access private sector farm inputs productivity Though input vouchers are being publicized as a mechanism to simultaneously target subsidies and develop demand in private markets, limited empirical evidence of their effect on private input demand exists. Few empirical studies, if any, exist on the effect of targeted subsidies on private input demand in Nigeria or West Africa . Consequently this study begins to fill this gap by estimating the effect of a targeted input subsidy on farmer participation in the private fertilizer market in Nigeria. Using a double hurdle model and a control function approach, this study explores the effect of increasing access to subsidized fertilizer on farmer participation in the private fertilizer market in Kano, Nigeria. The study finds evidence that farmers who received subsidized fertilizer in 2009 tended to have less assets than their counterparts who did not. Within this context, although receiving subsidized fertilizer did not appear to increase the probability of participating in the private fertilizer market, it did increase the quantity of fertilizer purchased from the private market once the decision to participate had been made. It appears that one benefit of the voucher program was that it developed links between rural farmers and input suppliers. Furthermore, where private fertilizer markets are weak, results indicate that there could be significant gains from the temporary use of voucher programs to create links between input suppliers and farmers. 2012 2024-10-01T13:58:28Z 2024-10-01T13:58:28Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/153935 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda. 2012. Targeted Subsidies and Private Market Participation: An Assessment of Fertilizer Demand in Nigeria. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1194. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/153935
spellingShingle subsidies
fertilizers
demand
market access
private sector
farm inputs
productivity
Liverpool-Tasie, Lenis Saweda O.
Targeted Subsidies and Private Market Participation: An Assessment of Fertilizer Demand in Nigeria
title Targeted Subsidies and Private Market Participation: An Assessment of Fertilizer Demand in Nigeria
title_full Targeted Subsidies and Private Market Participation: An Assessment of Fertilizer Demand in Nigeria
title_fullStr Targeted Subsidies and Private Market Participation: An Assessment of Fertilizer Demand in Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Targeted Subsidies and Private Market Participation: An Assessment of Fertilizer Demand in Nigeria
title_short Targeted Subsidies and Private Market Participation: An Assessment of Fertilizer Demand in Nigeria
title_sort targeted subsidies and private market participation an assessment of fertilizer demand in nigeria
topic subsidies
fertilizers
demand
market access
private sector
farm inputs
productivity
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/153935
work_keys_str_mv AT liverpooltasielenissawedao targetedsubsidiesandprivatemarketparticipationanassessmentoffertilizerdemandinnigeria