Still waiting for Godot?: Improving Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) to enable more evidence-based nutrition policies

The constrained evidence base of food and nutrition policy-making compromises nutrition programs. Nutrition policy-making must do better than relying exclusively on Food and Agriculture Organization Food Balance Sheets. The strategy of relying on observed-weighed food record or 24-hour recall survey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiedler, John L., Carletto, Calogero, Dupriez, Olivier
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/153207
_version_ 1855520024254480384
author Fiedler, John L.
Carletto, Calogero
Dupriez, Olivier
author_browse Carletto, Calogero
Dupriez, Olivier
Fiedler, John L.
author_facet Fiedler, John L.
Carletto, Calogero
Dupriez, Olivier
author_sort Fiedler, John L.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The constrained evidence base of food and nutrition policy-making compromises nutrition programs. Nutrition policy-making must do better than relying exclusively on Food and Agriculture Organization Food Balance Sheets. The strategy of relying on observed-weighed food record or 24-hour recall surveys has not proven practical either; they remain few in number, generally not nationally representative, and of dubious external validity. Although Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) have shortcomings, they are increasingly being used to address this information gap.To promote dialog within the nutrition community, and between it and the greater community of HCES stakeholders, in order to identify their shared agenda and develop a strategy to improve HCES for analyzing food and nutrition issues.The diverse origins and objectives of HCES are described, the evolution of their use in addressing food and nutrition issues is traced, and their shortcomings are identified.The causes, relative importance, some potential solutions, and the strategic implications of three distinct categories of shortcomings are discussed. Elements of a possible approach and process for strengthening the surveys are outlined, including identifying best practices, developing guidelines and more rigorously analyzing the tradeoffs involved in common, key survey design and implementation decisions.To date, the nutrition community's role in most HCES has been as a passive user of secondary data. The nutrition community must become more involved in the design, implementation, and analysis of HCES by identifying criteria for prioritizing countries, establishing assessment criteria, applying the criteria in retrospective assessments, identifying key shortcomings, and recommending alternatives to ameliorate the short-comings. Several trends suggest that this is a propitious time for improving the relevance and reliability of HCES.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace153207
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2012
publishDateRange 2012
publishDateSort 2012
publisher SAGE Publications
publisherStr SAGE Publications
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1532072025-04-08T18:33:03Z Still waiting for Godot?: Improving Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) to enable more evidence-based nutrition policies Fiedler, John L. Carletto, Calogero Dupriez, Olivier policies fortified foods household consumption and expenditures surveys household surveys nutrition nutrition policies The constrained evidence base of food and nutrition policy-making compromises nutrition programs. Nutrition policy-making must do better than relying exclusively on Food and Agriculture Organization Food Balance Sheets. The strategy of relying on observed-weighed food record or 24-hour recall surveys has not proven practical either; they remain few in number, generally not nationally representative, and of dubious external validity. Although Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) have shortcomings, they are increasingly being used to address this information gap.To promote dialog within the nutrition community, and between it and the greater community of HCES stakeholders, in order to identify their shared agenda and develop a strategy to improve HCES for analyzing food and nutrition issues.The diverse origins and objectives of HCES are described, the evolution of their use in addressing food and nutrition issues is traced, and their shortcomings are identified.The causes, relative importance, some potential solutions, and the strategic implications of three distinct categories of shortcomings are discussed. Elements of a possible approach and process for strengthening the surveys are outlined, including identifying best practices, developing guidelines and more rigorously analyzing the tradeoffs involved in common, key survey design and implementation decisions.To date, the nutrition community's role in most HCES has been as a passive user of secondary data. The nutrition community must become more involved in the design, implementation, and analysis of HCES by identifying criteria for prioritizing countries, establishing assessment criteria, applying the criteria in retrospective assessments, identifying key shortcomings, and recommending alternatives to ameliorate the short-comings. Several trends suggest that this is a propitious time for improving the relevance and reliability of HCES. 2012-09 2024-10-01T13:55:47Z 2024-10-01T13:55:47Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/153207 en Open Access SAGE Publications Fiedler, John L.; Carletto, Calogero; Dupriez, Olivier 2012. Still waiting for Godot? Improving Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) to enable more evidence-based nutrition policies. Food & Nutrition Bulletin 33(Supplement 2): 242S-251S https://doi.org/10.1177/15648265120333S214
spellingShingle policies
fortified foods
household consumption and expenditures surveys
household surveys
nutrition
nutrition policies
Fiedler, John L.
Carletto, Calogero
Dupriez, Olivier
Still waiting for Godot?: Improving Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) to enable more evidence-based nutrition policies
title Still waiting for Godot?: Improving Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) to enable more evidence-based nutrition policies
title_full Still waiting for Godot?: Improving Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) to enable more evidence-based nutrition policies
title_fullStr Still waiting for Godot?: Improving Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) to enable more evidence-based nutrition policies
title_full_unstemmed Still waiting for Godot?: Improving Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) to enable more evidence-based nutrition policies
title_short Still waiting for Godot?: Improving Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES) to enable more evidence-based nutrition policies
title_sort still waiting for godot improving household consumption and expenditures surveys hces to enable more evidence based nutrition policies
topic policies
fortified foods
household consumption and expenditures surveys
household surveys
nutrition
nutrition policies
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/153207
work_keys_str_mv AT fiedlerjohnl stillwaitingforgodotimprovinghouseholdconsumptionandexpendituressurveyshcestoenablemoreevidencebasednutritionpolicies
AT carlettocalogero stillwaitingforgodotimprovinghouseholdconsumptionandexpendituressurveyshcestoenablemoreevidencebasednutritionpolicies
AT dupriezolivier stillwaitingforgodotimprovinghouseholdconsumptionandexpendituressurveyshcestoenablemoreevidencebasednutritionpolicies