Assessing Zambia's industrial fortification options: Getting beyond changes in prevalence and cost-effectiveness

Since fortification of sugar with vitamin A was mandated in 1998, Zambia's fortification program has not changed, while the country remains plagued by high rates of micronutrient deficiencies.To provide evidence-based fortification options with the hope of reinvigorating the Zambian fortification pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fiedler, John L., Lividini, Keith, Kabaghe, Gladys, Zulu, Rodah, Tehinse, John, Bermudez, Odilia I., Jallier, Vincent, Guyondet, Christophe
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: SAGE Publications 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/152954
_version_ 1855537920238157824
author Fiedler, John L.
Lividini, Keith
Kabaghe, Gladys
Zulu, Rodah
Tehinse, John
Bermudez, Odilia I.
Jallier, Vincent
Guyondet, Christophe
author_browse Bermudez, Odilia I.
Fiedler, John L.
Guyondet, Christophe
Jallier, Vincent
Kabaghe, Gladys
Lividini, Keith
Tehinse, John
Zulu, Rodah
author_facet Fiedler, John L.
Lividini, Keith
Kabaghe, Gladys
Zulu, Rodah
Tehinse, John
Bermudez, Odilia I.
Jallier, Vincent
Guyondet, Christophe
author_sort Fiedler, John L.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Since fortification of sugar with vitamin A was mandated in 1998, Zambia's fortification program has not changed, while the country remains plagued by high rates of micronutrient deficiencies.To provide evidence-based fortification options with the hope of reinvigorating the Zambian fortification program.Zambia's 2006 Living Conditions Monitoring Survey is used to estimate the apparent intakes of vitamin A, iron, and zinc, as well as the apparent consumption levels and coverage of four fortification vehicles. Fourteen alternative food fortification portfolios are modeled, and their costs, impacts, average cost-effectiveness, and incremental cost-effectiveness are calculated using three alternative impact measures.Alternative impact measures result in different rank orderings of the portfolios. The most cost-effective portfolio is vegetable oil, which has a cost per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) saved ranging from 12% to 25% of that of sugar, depending on the impact measure used. The public health impact of fortified vegetable oil, however, is relatively modest. Additional criteria beyond cost-effectiveness are introduced and used to rank order the portfolios. The size of the public health impact, the total cost, and the incremental cost-effectiveness of phasing in multiple vehicle portfolios over time are analyzed.Assessing fortification portfolios by measuring changes in the prevalence of inadequate intakes underestimates impact. A more sensitive measure, which also takes into account change in the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) gap, is provided by a dose—response-based approach to estimating the number of DALYs saved. There exist highly cost-effective fortification intervention portfolios with substantial public health impacts and variable price tags that could help improve Zambians' nutrition status.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace152954
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2013
publishDateRange 2013
publishDateSort 2013
publisher SAGE Publications
publisherStr SAGE Publications
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1529542024-11-15T08:53:01Z Assessing Zambia's industrial fortification options: Getting beyond changes in prevalence and cost-effectiveness Fiedler, John L. Lividini, Keith Kabaghe, Gladys Zulu, Rodah Tehinse, John Bermudez, Odilia I. Jallier, Vincent Guyondet, Christophe biofortification nutrition trace elements retinol zinc food policies household consumption nutrition surveys food fortification household surveys food intake Since fortification of sugar with vitamin A was mandated in 1998, Zambia's fortification program has not changed, while the country remains plagued by high rates of micronutrient deficiencies.To provide evidence-based fortification options with the hope of reinvigorating the Zambian fortification program.Zambia's 2006 Living Conditions Monitoring Survey is used to estimate the apparent intakes of vitamin A, iron, and zinc, as well as the apparent consumption levels and coverage of four fortification vehicles. Fourteen alternative food fortification portfolios are modeled, and their costs, impacts, average cost-effectiveness, and incremental cost-effectiveness are calculated using three alternative impact measures.Alternative impact measures result in different rank orderings of the portfolios. The most cost-effective portfolio is vegetable oil, which has a cost per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) saved ranging from 12% to 25% of that of sugar, depending on the impact measure used. The public health impact of fortified vegetable oil, however, is relatively modest. Additional criteria beyond cost-effectiveness are introduced and used to rank order the portfolios. The size of the public health impact, the total cost, and the incremental cost-effectiveness of phasing in multiple vehicle portfolios over time are analyzed.Assessing fortification portfolios by measuring changes in the prevalence of inadequate intakes underestimates impact. A more sensitive measure, which also takes into account change in the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) gap, is provided by a dose—response-based approach to estimating the number of DALYs saved. There exist highly cost-effective fortification intervention portfolios with substantial public health impacts and variable price tags that could help improve Zambians' nutrition status. 2013-12 2024-10-01T13:55:23Z 2024-10-01T13:55:23Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/152954 en Limited Access SAGE Publications Fiedler, John L.; Lividini, Keith; Kabaghe, Gladys; Zulu, Rodah; Tehinse, John; Bermudez, Odilia I.; Jallier, Vincent; and Guyondet, Christophe. 2013. Assessing Zambia's industrial fortification options: Getting beyond changes in prevalence and cost-effectiveness. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 34(4): 501-519. https://doi.org/10.1177/156482651303400413
spellingShingle biofortification
nutrition
trace elements
retinol
zinc
food policies
household consumption
nutrition surveys
food fortification
household surveys
food intake
Fiedler, John L.
Lividini, Keith
Kabaghe, Gladys
Zulu, Rodah
Tehinse, John
Bermudez, Odilia I.
Jallier, Vincent
Guyondet, Christophe
Assessing Zambia's industrial fortification options: Getting beyond changes in prevalence and cost-effectiveness
title Assessing Zambia's industrial fortification options: Getting beyond changes in prevalence and cost-effectiveness
title_full Assessing Zambia's industrial fortification options: Getting beyond changes in prevalence and cost-effectiveness
title_fullStr Assessing Zambia's industrial fortification options: Getting beyond changes in prevalence and cost-effectiveness
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Zambia's industrial fortification options: Getting beyond changes in prevalence and cost-effectiveness
title_short Assessing Zambia's industrial fortification options: Getting beyond changes in prevalence and cost-effectiveness
title_sort assessing zambia s industrial fortification options getting beyond changes in prevalence and cost effectiveness
topic biofortification
nutrition
trace elements
retinol
zinc
food policies
household consumption
nutrition surveys
food fortification
household surveys
food intake
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/152954
work_keys_str_mv AT fiedlerjohnl assessingzambiasindustrialfortificationoptionsgettingbeyondchangesinprevalenceandcosteffectiveness
AT lividinikeith assessingzambiasindustrialfortificationoptionsgettingbeyondchangesinprevalenceandcosteffectiveness
AT kabaghegladys assessingzambiasindustrialfortificationoptionsgettingbeyondchangesinprevalenceandcosteffectiveness
AT zulurodah assessingzambiasindustrialfortificationoptionsgettingbeyondchangesinprevalenceandcosteffectiveness
AT tehinsejohn assessingzambiasindustrialfortificationoptionsgettingbeyondchangesinprevalenceandcosteffectiveness
AT bermudezodiliai assessingzambiasindustrialfortificationoptionsgettingbeyondchangesinprevalenceandcosteffectiveness
AT jalliervincent assessingzambiasindustrialfortificationoptionsgettingbeyondchangesinprevalenceandcosteffectiveness
AT guyondetchristophe assessingzambiasindustrialfortificationoptionsgettingbeyondchangesinprevalenceandcosteffectiveness