Policy implications of using a Household Consumption and Expenditures Survey versus an Observed-Weighed Food Record Survey to design a food fortification program
Observed-Weighed Food Record Surveys (OWFR) are regarded as the most precise dietary assessment methodology, despite their recognized shortcomings, which include limited availability, high cost, small samples with uncertain external validity that rarely include all household members, Hawthorne effec...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
SAGE Publications
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/152953 |
Similar Items: Policy implications of using a Household Consumption and Expenditures Survey versus an Observed-Weighed Food Record Survey to design a food fortification program
- Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES): A primer for food and nutrition analysts in low- and middle-income countries
- Identifying Zambia's industrial fortification options: Toward overcoming the food and nutrition information gap-induced impasse
- Assessing Zambia's industrial fortification options: Getting beyond changes in prevalence and cost-effectiveness
- Monitoring population diet quality and nutrition status with household consumption and expenditure surveys: Suggestions for a Bangladesh baseline
- Assessing alternative industrial fortification portfolios: A Bangladesh case study
- Estimating micronutrient intakes from Household Consumption and Expenditures Surveys (HCES): An example from Bangladesh