Modern input promotion in sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from Asian green revolution

Using case materials from four major cereal growing countries in Asia (Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, and Pakistan), the article analyzes key aspects of agricultural input policies in Asia. Results suggest that Asian policies differ from the current wave of African input subsidy programs in three imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rashid, Shahidur, Dorosh, Paul A., Malek, Mehrab, Lemma, Solomon
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Wiley 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/152883
_version_ 1855514480983670784
author Rashid, Shahidur
Dorosh, Paul A.
Malek, Mehrab
Lemma, Solomon
author_browse Dorosh, Paul A.
Lemma, Solomon
Malek, Mehrab
Rashid, Shahidur
author_facet Rashid, Shahidur
Dorosh, Paul A.
Malek, Mehrab
Lemma, Solomon
author_sort Rashid, Shahidur
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Using case materials from four major cereal growing countries in Asia (Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, and Pakistan), the article analyzes key aspects of agricultural input policies in Asia. Results suggest that Asian policies differ from the current wave of African input subsidy programs in three important ways: (i) instead of focusing mostly on seed and chemical fertilizer, input promotion in Asia involved a package approach involving investments in agricultural R&D, irrigation, promotion of domestic fertilizer, and investments in rural roads; (ii) farmers in three of four countries paid higher prices (net taxed) for fertilizer during the height of the green revolution, suggesting that it was the profitability, not the subsidy, that was central to increasing fertilizer use; and (iii) Asian countries did not target input subsidies, but given leakage and diversion estimates of targeted programs, it is unclear whether targeting would have been more cost‐effective. Both continents have two challenges in common: degradation of soil health and increasingly larger shares of public spending on input subsidies. The first challenge calls for paying attentions to improving fertilizer use efficiency, which is an achievable target, with high pay off in the long run. The other challenge is now a historical fact—that is, once introduced, subsidies are hard to eliminate, even if they no longer contribute to agricultural productivity growth.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace152883
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2013
publishDateRange 2013
publishDateSort 2013
publisher Wiley
publisherStr Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1528832024-11-15T08:52:05Z Modern input promotion in sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from Asian green revolution Rashid, Shahidur Dorosh, Paul A. Malek, Mehrab Lemma, Solomon agricultural policies farm inputs subsidies green revolution Using case materials from four major cereal growing countries in Asia (Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, and Pakistan), the article analyzes key aspects of agricultural input policies in Asia. Results suggest that Asian policies differ from the current wave of African input subsidy programs in three important ways: (i) instead of focusing mostly on seed and chemical fertilizer, input promotion in Asia involved a package approach involving investments in agricultural R&D, irrigation, promotion of domestic fertilizer, and investments in rural roads; (ii) farmers in three of four countries paid higher prices (net taxed) for fertilizer during the height of the green revolution, suggesting that it was the profitability, not the subsidy, that was central to increasing fertilizer use; and (iii) Asian countries did not target input subsidies, but given leakage and diversion estimates of targeted programs, it is unclear whether targeting would have been more cost‐effective. Both continents have two challenges in common: degradation of soil health and increasingly larger shares of public spending on input subsidies. The first challenge calls for paying attentions to improving fertilizer use efficiency, which is an achievable target, with high pay off in the long run. The other challenge is now a historical fact—that is, once introduced, subsidies are hard to eliminate, even if they no longer contribute to agricultural productivity growth. 2013-11 2024-10-01T13:55:18Z 2024-10-01T13:55:18Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/152883 en Limited Access Wiley Rashid, Shahidur; Dorosh, Paul A.; Malek, Mehrab; and Lemma, Solomon. 2013. Modern input promotion in sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from Asian green revolution. Agricultural Economics 44(6): 705-721. Special Issue on Input Subsidy Programs (ISPs) in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.12083/abstract
spellingShingle agricultural policies
farm inputs
subsidies
green revolution
Rashid, Shahidur
Dorosh, Paul A.
Malek, Mehrab
Lemma, Solomon
Modern input promotion in sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from Asian green revolution
title Modern input promotion in sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from Asian green revolution
title_full Modern input promotion in sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from Asian green revolution
title_fullStr Modern input promotion in sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from Asian green revolution
title_full_unstemmed Modern input promotion in sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from Asian green revolution
title_short Modern input promotion in sub-Saharan Africa: Insights from Asian green revolution
title_sort modern input promotion in sub saharan africa insights from asian green revolution
topic agricultural policies
farm inputs
subsidies
green revolution
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/152883
work_keys_str_mv AT rashidshahidur moderninputpromotioninsubsaharanafricainsightsfromasiangreenrevolution
AT doroshpaula moderninputpromotioninsubsaharanafricainsightsfromasiangreenrevolution
AT malekmehrab moderninputpromotioninsubsaharanafricainsightsfromasiangreenrevolution
AT lemmasolomon moderninputpromotioninsubsaharanafricainsightsfromasiangreenrevolution