Assessing the potential cost of a failed Doha Round

This study offers new conclusions on the economic cost of a failed Doha Development Agenda (DDA). We assess potential outcome of the Doha Round as well as four protectionist scenarios using the MIRAGE Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model. In a scenario where applied tariffs of World Trade Orga...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bouët, Antoine, Laborde Debucquet, David
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: Cambridge University Press 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/152870
_version_ 1855535462150569984
author Bouët, Antoine
Laborde Debucquet, David
author_browse Bouët, Antoine
Laborde Debucquet, David
author_facet Bouët, Antoine
Laborde Debucquet, David
author_sort Bouët, Antoine
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This study offers new conclusions on the economic cost of a failed Doha Development Agenda (DDA). We assess potential outcome of the Doha Round as well as four protectionist scenarios using the MIRAGE Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model. In a scenario where applied tariffs of World Trade Organization (WTO) economies would go up to currently bound tariff rates, world trade would decrease by 9.9% and world welfare by US$353 billion. The economic cost of a failed DDA is here evaluated by the difference between a cooperative scenario (DDA) and a protectionist one (US$412 billion in terms of welfare). Another point of view is to compare a resort to protectionism when the DDA is implemented with a resort to protectionism when the DDA is not implemented. The findings show that this trade agreement could prevent the potential reduction of US$809 billion of trade and, therefore, acts as an efficient multilateral ‘preventive’ scheme against the adverse consequences of trade ‘beggar-thy-neighbor’ policies.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace152870
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2010
publishDateRange 2010
publishDateSort 2010
publisher Cambridge University Press
publisherStr Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1528702024-11-15T08:52:55Z Assessing the potential cost of a failed Doha Round Bouët, Antoine Laborde Debucquet, David models This study offers new conclusions on the economic cost of a failed Doha Development Agenda (DDA). We assess potential outcome of the Doha Round as well as four protectionist scenarios using the MIRAGE Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model. In a scenario where applied tariffs of World Trade Organization (WTO) economies would go up to currently bound tariff rates, world trade would decrease by 9.9% and world welfare by US$353 billion. The economic cost of a failed DDA is here evaluated by the difference between a cooperative scenario (DDA) and a protectionist one (US$412 billion in terms of welfare). Another point of view is to compare a resort to protectionism when the DDA is implemented with a resort to protectionism when the DDA is not implemented. The findings show that this trade agreement could prevent the potential reduction of US$809 billion of trade and, therefore, acts as an efficient multilateral ‘preventive’ scheme against the adverse consequences of trade ‘beggar-thy-neighbor’ policies. 2010-04 2024-10-01T13:55:18Z 2024-10-01T13:55:18Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/152870 en Limited Access Cambridge University Press Bouët, Antoine; Laborde Debucquet, David. 2010. Assessing the potential cost of a failed Doha Round. World Trade Review 9(2): 319-351. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745609990267
spellingShingle models
Bouët, Antoine
Laborde Debucquet, David
Assessing the potential cost of a failed Doha Round
title Assessing the potential cost of a failed Doha Round
title_full Assessing the potential cost of a failed Doha Round
title_fullStr Assessing the potential cost of a failed Doha Round
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the potential cost of a failed Doha Round
title_short Assessing the potential cost of a failed Doha Round
title_sort assessing the potential cost of a failed doha round
topic models
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/152870
work_keys_str_mv AT bouetantoine assessingthepotentialcostofafaileddoharound
AT labordedebucquetdavid assessingthepotentialcostofafaileddoharound