Bringing rigor to evaluations of large-scale programs to improve infant and young child feeding and nutrition: The evaluation designs for the Alive & Thrive initiative
The evidence base on the impact of large-scale infant and young child feeding (IYCF) and nutrition programs is limited, partly due to the challenges of rigorously evaluating complex programs including multiple interventions.To describe the process used to design Alive & Thrive's impact evaluations i...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
SAGE Publications
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/152863 |
Similar Items: Bringing rigor to evaluations of large-scale programs to improve infant and young child feeding and nutrition: The evaluation designs for the Alive & Thrive initiative
- Rapid improvements in infant and young child feeding practices resulting from a large-scale program: Alive & Thrive’s approach and results in Bangladesh
- Changes in norms about infant and young child feeding in rural Bangladesh during the Alive & Thrive Initiative
- Context matters: Insights from two randomized evaluations of behavior change interventions on factors influencing infant and young child feeding practices in Bangladesh and Vietnam
- Large-scale behavior-change initiative for infant and young child feeding advanced language and motor development in a cluster-randomized program evaluation in Bangladesh
- Learning how programs achieve their impact: Embedding theory-driven process evaluation and other program learning mechanisms in Alive & Thrive
- Maternal willingness to pay for infant and young child nutrition counseling services in Vietnam