Do shocks affect men’s and women’s assets differently? Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda

Bangladesh and Uganda were chosen, first, based on the availability of data from both countries before and after the 2007/08 food-price crisis (allowing the establishment of precrisis baseline values) and, second, because the two countries exhibit very different sociocultural traditions, implying th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quisumbing, Agnes R., Kumar, Neha, Behrman, Julia A.
Formato: Brief
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Food Policy Research Institute 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/151345
_version_ 1855532767310249984
author Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Kumar, Neha
Behrman, Julia A.
author_browse Behrman, Julia A.
Kumar, Neha
Quisumbing, Agnes R.
author_facet Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Kumar, Neha
Behrman, Julia A.
author_sort Quisumbing, Agnes R.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Bangladesh and Uganda were chosen, first, based on the availability of data from both countries before and after the 2007/08 food-price crisis (allowing the establishment of precrisis baseline values) and, second, because the two countries exhibit very different sociocultural traditions, implying that the gendered impacts of shocks in each country would be different.
format Brief
id CGSpace151345
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1513452025-11-06T04:39:11Z Do shocks affect men’s and women’s assets differently? Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda Quisumbing, Agnes R. Kumar, Neha Behrman, Julia A. gender environmental factors households assets resilience women climate change Bangladesh and Uganda were chosen, first, based on the availability of data from both countries before and after the 2007/08 food-price crisis (allowing the establishment of precrisis baseline values) and, second, because the two countries exhibit very different sociocultural traditions, implying that the gendered impacts of shocks in each country would be different. 2014 2024-08-01T02:56:46Z 2024-08-01T02:56:46Z Brief https://hdl.handle.net/10568/151345 en https://hdl.handle.net/10568/151427 Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Kumar, Neha and Behrman, Julia A. 2014. Do shocks affect men’s and women’s assets differently? Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda. In Enhancing women’s assets to manage risk under climate change: Potential for group-based approaches. Ringler, Claudia; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Bryan, Elizabeth; Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela, Eds. 2014. Pp. 29-32. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/151345
spellingShingle gender
environmental factors
households
assets
resilience
women
climate change
Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Kumar, Neha
Behrman, Julia A.
Do shocks affect men’s and women’s assets differently? Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda
title Do shocks affect men’s and women’s assets differently? Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda
title_full Do shocks affect men’s and women’s assets differently? Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda
title_fullStr Do shocks affect men’s and women’s assets differently? Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Do shocks affect men’s and women’s assets differently? Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda
title_short Do shocks affect men’s and women’s assets differently? Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda
title_sort do shocks affect men s and women s assets differently evidence from bangladesh and uganda
topic gender
environmental factors
households
assets
resilience
women
climate change
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/151345
work_keys_str_mv AT quisumbingagnesr doshocksaffectmensandwomensassetsdifferentlyevidencefrombangladeshanduganda
AT kumarneha doshocksaffectmensandwomensassetsdifferentlyevidencefrombangladeshanduganda
AT behrmanjuliaa doshocksaffectmensandwomensassetsdifferentlyevidencefrombangladeshanduganda