An analysis of the costs of Uganda's Child Days Plus: Do low costs reveal an efficient program or an underfinanced one?

Twice annually, Uganda implements Child Days Plus (CDP), a month-long outreach activity that distributes vitamin A capsules to preschool children and deworms children 6 months to 14 years old. Introduced initially as a temporary, interim strategy, CDP is now a decade old.To assess how well CDP is im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fiedler, John L., Semakula, Richard
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/151016
_version_ 1855517391506636800
author Fiedler, John L.
Semakula, Richard
author_browse Fiedler, John L.
Semakula, Richard
author_facet Fiedler, John L.
Semakula, Richard
author_sort Fiedler, John L.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Twice annually, Uganda implements Child Days Plus (CDP), a month-long outreach activity that distributes vitamin A capsules to preschool children and deworms children 6 months to 14 years old. Introduced initially as a temporary, interim strategy, CDP is now a decade old.To assess how well CDP is implemented using an activity-based cost analysis.In the absence of a cost-accounting system for CDP, we defined the six major CDP activities as cost centers and identified five important subactivities required to implement a round of CDP. Based on a purposive sample, we conducted a structured interview survey of 59 Ministry of Health facilities, 9 district offices, and national-level CDP staff.Only one-third of the facilities implemented all 11 CDP core activities. The survey revealed that Ministry of Health staff and volunteers are frequently paid substantially less in allowances than they are entitled to for their CDP outreach activities. Viewing these two practices—nonimplementation and less-than-full-reimbursement—as indicators of CDP's underfinancing, we estimate the program is underfinanced by the equivalent of 37% of its “full implementation” costs. Two-thirds of underfinancing is manifested in nonimplementation and one-third as less-than full-reimbursement. CDP exploits economies of scale and scope and has an average cost per child served of US$0.22. We estimate that it annually saves 367,000 disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) at an average cost of US$12.5, making it—despite its underfinancing—highly cost-effective.Increased CDP funding would enable its vitamin A coverage rate of 58% and its deworming coverage rate of 62% to be increased, thereby increasing its effectiveness and efficiency. CDP should be “relaunched,” as part of an effort to improve the structure of the program, set expectations about it, and earmark a minimum of resources for CDP. The Ministry of Health should demonstrate its new, greater commitment to CDP by introducing a program-specific budget line item, increasing CDP's budget allocation, and developing and implementing a training program that identifies the minimum uniform activities required to implement CDP.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace151016
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
publisherStr SAGE Publications
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1510162024-10-25T07:54:07Z An analysis of the costs of Uganda's Child Days Plus: Do low costs reveal an efficient program or an underfinanced one? Fiedler, John L. Semakula, Richard implementation nutrition policies child health health policies retinol supplements resource allocation children deworming financing cost analysis health care Twice annually, Uganda implements Child Days Plus (CDP), a month-long outreach activity that distributes vitamin A capsules to preschool children and deworms children 6 months to 14 years old. Introduced initially as a temporary, interim strategy, CDP is now a decade old.To assess how well CDP is implemented using an activity-based cost analysis.In the absence of a cost-accounting system for CDP, we defined the six major CDP activities as cost centers and identified five important subactivities required to implement a round of CDP. Based on a purposive sample, we conducted a structured interview survey of 59 Ministry of Health facilities, 9 district offices, and national-level CDP staff.Only one-third of the facilities implemented all 11 CDP core activities. The survey revealed that Ministry of Health staff and volunteers are frequently paid substantially less in allowances than they are entitled to for their CDP outreach activities. Viewing these two practices—nonimplementation and less-than-full-reimbursement—as indicators of CDP's underfinancing, we estimate the program is underfinanced by the equivalent of 37% of its “full implementation” costs. Two-thirds of underfinancing is manifested in nonimplementation and one-third as less-than full-reimbursement. CDP exploits economies of scale and scope and has an average cost per child served of US$0.22. We estimate that it annually saves 367,000 disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) at an average cost of US$12.5, making it—despite its underfinancing—highly cost-effective.Increased CDP funding would enable its vitamin A coverage rate of 58% and its deworming coverage rate of 62% to be increased, thereby increasing its effectiveness and efficiency. CDP should be “relaunched,” as part of an effort to improve the structure of the program, set expectations about it, and earmark a minimum of resources for CDP. The Ministry of Health should demonstrate its new, greater commitment to CDP by introducing a program-specific budget line item, increasing CDP's budget allocation, and developing and implementing a training program that identifies the minimum uniform activities required to implement CDP. 2014 2024-08-01T02:54:49Z 2024-08-01T02:54:49Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/151016 en Limited Access SAGE Publications Fiedler, John L.; and Semakula, Richard. 2014. An analysis of the costs of Uganda's Child Days Plus: Do low costs reveal an efficient program or an underfinanced one? Food and Nutrition Bulletin 35(1): 92-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/156482651403500111
spellingShingle implementation
nutrition policies
child health
health policies
retinol
supplements
resource allocation
children
deworming
financing
cost analysis
health care
Fiedler, John L.
Semakula, Richard
An analysis of the costs of Uganda's Child Days Plus: Do low costs reveal an efficient program or an underfinanced one?
title An analysis of the costs of Uganda's Child Days Plus: Do low costs reveal an efficient program or an underfinanced one?
title_full An analysis of the costs of Uganda's Child Days Plus: Do low costs reveal an efficient program or an underfinanced one?
title_fullStr An analysis of the costs of Uganda's Child Days Plus: Do low costs reveal an efficient program or an underfinanced one?
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of the costs of Uganda's Child Days Plus: Do low costs reveal an efficient program or an underfinanced one?
title_short An analysis of the costs of Uganda's Child Days Plus: Do low costs reveal an efficient program or an underfinanced one?
title_sort analysis of the costs of uganda s child days plus do low costs reveal an efficient program or an underfinanced one
topic implementation
nutrition policies
child health
health policies
retinol
supplements
resource allocation
children
deworming
financing
cost analysis
health care
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/151016
work_keys_str_mv AT fiedlerjohnl ananalysisofthecostsofugandaschilddaysplusdolowcostsrevealanefficientprogramoranunderfinancedone
AT semakularichard ananalysisofthecostsofugandaschilddaysplusdolowcostsrevealanefficientprogramoranunderfinancedone
AT fiedlerjohnl analysisofthecostsofugandaschilddaysplusdolowcostsrevealanefficientprogramoranunderfinancedone
AT semakularichard analysisofthecostsofugandaschilddaysplusdolowcostsrevealanefficientprogramoranunderfinancedone