Reply to Victora et al.
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/150095 |
Ejemplares similares: Reply to Victora et al.
- Using height-for-age differences (HAD) instead of height-for-age z-scores (HAZ) for the meaningful measurement of population-level catch-up in linear growth in children less than 5 years of age
- Using height-for-age difference instead of height-for-age Z-scores for the meaningful measurement of catch-up growth in children less than 5 years of age
- What's up with catch-up?: No evidence of population-level catch-up growth in children under 5 years of age when using height-for-age difference (HAD) instead of height-for-age z-scores (HAZ)
- Using height-adjusted stunting prevalence will fail disadvantaged children worldwide
- Linear growth deficit continues to accumulate beyond the first 1000 days in low- and middle-income countries: Global evidence from 51 national surveys
- Critical windows for nutritional interventions against stunting