Using best-worst scaling to inform agroecological interventions in Western Kenya

Both the demand for food and the environmental impacts of food production are estimated to significantly increase by 2050. Agroecological interventions have proven effective in facilitating the transition from current food production systems to more sustainable ones. These interventions can not only...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zander, Kerstin K., Drucker, Adam G., Aluso, Lillian, Mengistu, Dejene K., Fadda, Carlo, Termote, Céline, Davis, Kristin E.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Springer 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148990
_version_ 1855532382283628544
author Zander, Kerstin K.
Drucker, Adam G.
Aluso, Lillian
Mengistu, Dejene K.
Fadda, Carlo
Termote, Céline
Davis, Kristin E.
author_browse Aluso, Lillian
Davis, Kristin E.
Drucker, Adam G.
Fadda, Carlo
Mengistu, Dejene K.
Termote, Céline
Zander, Kerstin K.
author_facet Zander, Kerstin K.
Drucker, Adam G.
Aluso, Lillian
Mengistu, Dejene K.
Fadda, Carlo
Termote, Céline
Davis, Kristin E.
author_sort Zander, Kerstin K.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Both the demand for food and the environmental impacts of food production are estimated to significantly increase by 2050. Agroecological interventions have proven effective in facilitating the transition from current food production systems to more sustainable ones. These interventions can not only ensure more equitable food and nutritional security but also address poverty and reduce environmental impacts. As such, agroecological interventions can generate both private and public ecosystem services. Farmers play a key role in how food is produced, as the practices they use are linked with their preferences and expertise, as well as the constraints they face. Understanding farmers’ preferences for the adoption of different agroecological practices and their perceptions of the associated costs and benefits is critical to informing policies that can effectively support farmers in transitioning to more sustainable practices, including those that contribute to the generation of ecosystem services highly valued by broader society. To assess such preferences, we conducted a survey among farmers in Western Kenya which included a best-worst scaling experiment augmented by qualitative questions about the reasons for farmers’ views about the importance of the benefits arising from agroecological practices. Results show that farmers have strong preferences for adopting agroecological practices that generate private goods and are directly related to increasing productivity and food security, including improving health of household members. These may also include practices that have some public good elements as well, such as increasing agrobiodiversity. However, practices that generate broader public good benefits, including improved forest quality/coverage, reduced off-farm environmental impacts, greater community-level resilience to shocks, and improved landscape and wildlife management, were less important to farmers. Such findings can be used to inform policies that support farmer adoption of agroecological interventions best suited to different farming communities, as well as indicating the need for additional types of market-based incentives, such as through Payments for Ecosystem Service mechanisms.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace148990
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2026
publishDateRange 2026
publishDateSort 2026
publisher Springer
publisherStr Springer
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1489902026-01-02T15:32:42Z Using best-worst scaling to inform agroecological interventions in Western Kenya Zander, Kerstin K. Drucker, Adam G. Aluso, Lillian Mengistu, Dejene K. Fadda, Carlo Termote, Céline Davis, Kristin E. agroecology sustainability farmers poverty farmers' attitudes ecosystem services Both the demand for food and the environmental impacts of food production are estimated to significantly increase by 2050. Agroecological interventions have proven effective in facilitating the transition from current food production systems to more sustainable ones. These interventions can not only ensure more equitable food and nutritional security but also address poverty and reduce environmental impacts. As such, agroecological interventions can generate both private and public ecosystem services. Farmers play a key role in how food is produced, as the practices they use are linked with their preferences and expertise, as well as the constraints they face. Understanding farmers’ preferences for the adoption of different agroecological practices and their perceptions of the associated costs and benefits is critical to informing policies that can effectively support farmers in transitioning to more sustainable practices, including those that contribute to the generation of ecosystem services highly valued by broader society. To assess such preferences, we conducted a survey among farmers in Western Kenya which included a best-worst scaling experiment augmented by qualitative questions about the reasons for farmers’ views about the importance of the benefits arising from agroecological practices. Results show that farmers have strong preferences for adopting agroecological practices that generate private goods and are directly related to increasing productivity and food security, including improving health of household members. These may also include practices that have some public good elements as well, such as increasing agrobiodiversity. However, practices that generate broader public good benefits, including improved forest quality/coverage, reduced off-farm environmental impacts, greater community-level resilience to shocks, and improved landscape and wildlife management, were less important to farmers. Such findings can be used to inform policies that support farmer adoption of agroecological interventions best suited to different farming communities, as well as indicating the need for additional types of market-based incentives, such as through Payments for Ecosystem Service mechanisms. 2026 2024-07-09T15:41:15Z 2024-07-09T15:41:15Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148990 en Open Access application/pdf Springer Zander, Kerstin K.; Drucker, Adam G.; Drucker, Adam G.; Aluso, Lillian; Mengistu, Dejene K.; Fadda, Carlo; Termote, Céline; and Davis, Kristin. Using best-worst scaling to inform agroecological interventions in Western Kenya. Environment, Development and Sustainability. Article in press. First published online on June 28, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05173-5
spellingShingle agroecology
sustainability
farmers
poverty
farmers' attitudes
ecosystem services
Zander, Kerstin K.
Drucker, Adam G.
Aluso, Lillian
Mengistu, Dejene K.
Fadda, Carlo
Termote, Céline
Davis, Kristin E.
Using best-worst scaling to inform agroecological interventions in Western Kenya
title Using best-worst scaling to inform agroecological interventions in Western Kenya
title_full Using best-worst scaling to inform agroecological interventions in Western Kenya
title_fullStr Using best-worst scaling to inform agroecological interventions in Western Kenya
title_full_unstemmed Using best-worst scaling to inform agroecological interventions in Western Kenya
title_short Using best-worst scaling to inform agroecological interventions in Western Kenya
title_sort using best worst scaling to inform agroecological interventions in western kenya
topic agroecology
sustainability
farmers
poverty
farmers' attitudes
ecosystem services
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148990
work_keys_str_mv AT zanderkerstink usingbestworstscalingtoinformagroecologicalinterventionsinwesternkenya
AT druckeradamg usingbestworstscalingtoinformagroecologicalinterventionsinwesternkenya
AT alusolillian usingbestworstscalingtoinformagroecologicalinterventionsinwesternkenya
AT mengistudejenek usingbestworstscalingtoinformagroecologicalinterventionsinwesternkenya
AT faddacarlo usingbestworstscalingtoinformagroecologicalinterventionsinwesternkenya
AT termoteceline usingbestworstscalingtoinformagroecologicalinterventionsinwesternkenya
AT daviskristine usingbestworstscalingtoinformagroecologicalinterventionsinwesternkenya