Women’s land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: A framework and review of available evidence

Land is an important asset for rural households, and having secure land rights is important for poverty reduction. Despite the large body of literature on the relationship between land tenure security, livelihoods, and poverty, most of this literature is based on household-level data and does not co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S., Quisumbing, Agnes R., Theis, Sophie, Doss, Cheryl R.
Formato: Artículo preliminar
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Food Policy Research Institute 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148647
_version_ 1855534373408866304
author Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Theis, Sophie
Doss, Cheryl R.
author_browse Doss, Cheryl R.
Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Theis, Sophie
author_facet Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Theis, Sophie
Doss, Cheryl R.
author_sort Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Land is an important asset for rural households, and having secure land rights is important for poverty reduction. Despite the large body of literature on the relationship between land tenure security, livelihoods, and poverty, most of this literature is based on household-level data and does not consider possible intrahousehold inequalities in land ownership. We know very little about the relationship between women’s land rights and poverty, not only because data on women’s land rights (WLR) are rare, but also because of the implicit assumption that women belong to households that pool resources completely. Thus, it is the land rights of households, not women, that matter for poverty reduction. However, growing evidence that households do not pool resources completely and that women have fewer assets than men warrants attention to the potential role of WLR in poverty reduction. This paper reviews the literature on WLR and poverty reduction. It adapts the Gender, Agriculture and Assets Project (GAAP) conceptual framework to identify pathways by which WLR could reduce poverty and increase wellbeing of women and their households in rural areas. It uses a systematic review search methodology to identify papers for inclusion, but adopts a more synthetic approach to assess the level of agreement and the amount of evidence within this literature. The paper examines the evidence from qualitative as well as quantitative studies on each of these pathways. Owing to the scarcity of experimental studies, the review of empirical work is based mostly on observational studies. We find some evidence on these relationships, but many of the key pathways have not been empirically analyzed. The evidence is strong for relationships between WLR and bargaining power and decision making on consumption, human capital investment, and intergenerational transfers. There is a high level of agreement, but weaker evidence on the relationship between WLR and natural resource management, government services and institutions, empowerment and domestic violence, resilience and HIV risk, and consumption and food security. There is less agreement and insufficient evidence on the associations between WLR and other livelihoods, and a higher level of agreement, but still limited evidence on associations between WLR and credit, technology adoption, and agricultural productivity. Notably, we find no papers that directly investigate the link between WLR and poverty. Many gaps in the evidence arise from a failure to account for the complexity of land rights regimes, the measurement of land rights at the household level, the lack of attention paid to gender roles, and the lack of studies from countries outside Africa. Many studies are limited by small sample sizes, the lack of credible counterfactuals, lack of attention to endogeneity and selection bias, and possible response bias on questions of domestic violence and empowerment. There are very few rigorous evaluations of reforms that strengthened WLR. The paper concludes that gaps in the evidence should not deter the careful design and implementation of programs and policies to strengthen WLR, given the ongoing land tenure reforms in many countries. Different modalities and mechanisms for strengthening WLR could be tested, with appropriate counterfactuals. Program designers and evaluators can strategically identify pathways and outcomes where evidence gaps exist, and deliberately design studies to close those gaps.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace148647
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1486472025-11-06T07:10:03Z Women’s land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: A framework and review of available evidence Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. Quisumbing, Agnes R. Theis, Sophie Doss, Cheryl R. gender land tenure households land ownership property rights assets livelihoods land rights poverty women Land is an important asset for rural households, and having secure land rights is important for poverty reduction. Despite the large body of literature on the relationship between land tenure security, livelihoods, and poverty, most of this literature is based on household-level data and does not consider possible intrahousehold inequalities in land ownership. We know very little about the relationship between women’s land rights and poverty, not only because data on women’s land rights (WLR) are rare, but also because of the implicit assumption that women belong to households that pool resources completely. Thus, it is the land rights of households, not women, that matter for poverty reduction. However, growing evidence that households do not pool resources completely and that women have fewer assets than men warrants attention to the potential role of WLR in poverty reduction. This paper reviews the literature on WLR and poverty reduction. It adapts the Gender, Agriculture and Assets Project (GAAP) conceptual framework to identify pathways by which WLR could reduce poverty and increase wellbeing of women and their households in rural areas. It uses a systematic review search methodology to identify papers for inclusion, but adopts a more synthetic approach to assess the level of agreement and the amount of evidence within this literature. The paper examines the evidence from qualitative as well as quantitative studies on each of these pathways. Owing to the scarcity of experimental studies, the review of empirical work is based mostly on observational studies. We find some evidence on these relationships, but many of the key pathways have not been empirically analyzed. The evidence is strong for relationships between WLR and bargaining power and decision making on consumption, human capital investment, and intergenerational transfers. There is a high level of agreement, but weaker evidence on the relationship between WLR and natural resource management, government services and institutions, empowerment and domestic violence, resilience and HIV risk, and consumption and food security. There is less agreement and insufficient evidence on the associations between WLR and other livelihoods, and a higher level of agreement, but still limited evidence on associations between WLR and credit, technology adoption, and agricultural productivity. Notably, we find no papers that directly investigate the link between WLR and poverty. Many gaps in the evidence arise from a failure to account for the complexity of land rights regimes, the measurement of land rights at the household level, the lack of attention paid to gender roles, and the lack of studies from countries outside Africa. Many studies are limited by small sample sizes, the lack of credible counterfactuals, lack of attention to endogeneity and selection bias, and possible response bias on questions of domestic violence and empowerment. There are very few rigorous evaluations of reforms that strengthened WLR. The paper concludes that gaps in the evidence should not deter the careful design and implementation of programs and policies to strengthen WLR, given the ongoing land tenure reforms in many countries. Different modalities and mechanisms for strengthening WLR could be tested, with appropriate counterfactuals. Program designers and evaluators can strategically identify pathways and outcomes where evidence gaps exist, and deliberately design studies to close those gaps. 2017 2024-06-21T09:25:19Z 2024-06-21T09:25:19Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148647 en https://hdl.handle.net/10568/153727 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148104 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/151460 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/149731 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/12520 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.10.009 application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Doss, Cheryl R.; and Theis, Sophie. 2017. Women’s land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: A framework and review of available evidence. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1663. Washington, DC https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148647
spellingShingle gender
land tenure
households
land ownership
property rights
assets
livelihoods
land rights
poverty
women
Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S.
Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Theis, Sophie
Doss, Cheryl R.
Women’s land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: A framework and review of available evidence
title Women’s land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: A framework and review of available evidence
title_full Women’s land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: A framework and review of available evidence
title_fullStr Women’s land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: A framework and review of available evidence
title_full_unstemmed Women’s land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: A framework and review of available evidence
title_short Women’s land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: A framework and review of available evidence
title_sort women s land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction a framework and review of available evidence
topic gender
land tenure
households
land ownership
property rights
assets
livelihoods
land rights
poverty
women
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148647
work_keys_str_mv AT meinzendickruths womenslandrightsasapathwaytopovertyreductionaframeworkandreviewofavailableevidence
AT quisumbingagnesr womenslandrightsasapathwaytopovertyreductionaframeworkandreviewofavailableevidence
AT theissophie womenslandrightsasapathwaytopovertyreductionaframeworkandreviewofavailableevidence
AT dosscherylr womenslandrightsasapathwaytopovertyreductionaframeworkandreviewofavailableevidence