What drives input subsidy policy reform? The case of Zambia, 2002–2016
When and why do suboptimal agricultural policies persist despite technical evidence highlighting alternatives? And what explains episodes of reform after prolonged periods of policy inertia? This paper addresses these questions by applying the Kaleidoscope Model for agricultural and food security po...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo preliminar |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148618 |
Ejemplares similares: What drives input subsidy policy reform? The case of Zambia, 2002–2016
- Malawi's farm input subsidy program: Where do we go from here?
- Unpacking the political economy of fertilizer subsidy reforms
- The impact of alternative input subsidy exit strategies on Malawi’s maize commodity market
- Preface: Special Issue on Input Subsidy Programs (ISPs) in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
- Agricultural inputs subsidy and their developmental impact: Conventional wisdom
- The political economy of reforming agricultural support policies