Understanding the measurement of women’s autonomy: Illustrations from Bangladesh and Ghana

The past decade has seen increased attention to measuring women’s empowerment and autonomy, motivated by the goal of identifying promising programs and policies for reducing gender inequalities. One of the most common quantitative indicators of women’s empowerment is the self-reported ability to par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seymour, Gregory, Peterman, Amber
Formato: Artículo preliminar
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Food Policy Research Institute 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148565
_version_ 1855523640988139520
author Seymour, Gregory
Peterman, Amber
author_browse Peterman, Amber
Seymour, Gregory
author_facet Seymour, Gregory
Peterman, Amber
author_sort Seymour, Gregory
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The past decade has seen increased attention to measuring women’s empowerment and autonomy, motivated by the goal of identifying promising programs and policies for reducing gender inequalities. One of the most common quantitative indicators of women’s empowerment is the self-reported ability to participate in household decision making over important matters. Despite the widespread use of such indicators in the literature, uncertainty exists over how to construct valid indicators of empowerment based on questions about decision making. In particular, it is unclear how indicative joint decision making is of individual decision-making power and to what extent joint decision making reflects a consistent understanding of decision-making power within households. We utilize data from women and men in Bangladesh and Ghana to investigate whether respondents who report sole decision making in a particular domain tend to experience stronger or weaker feelings of autonomous motivation—measured using a Relative Autonomy Index—than those who report joint decision making. We find systematic differences between men and women in the association between feelings of autonomous motivation and decisionmaking outcomes. In addition, results vary by the domain of decision making and by whether or not there is a shared understanding of decision-making power within households. These findings suggest that in order to accurately measure empowerment, further innovation in the specificity as well as the sensitivity of indicators is needed.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace148565
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1485652025-11-06T06:03:56Z Understanding the measurement of women’s autonomy: Illustrations from Bangladesh and Ghana Seymour, Gregory Peterman, Amber gender women's empowerment decision making women The past decade has seen increased attention to measuring women’s empowerment and autonomy, motivated by the goal of identifying promising programs and policies for reducing gender inequalities. One of the most common quantitative indicators of women’s empowerment is the self-reported ability to participate in household decision making over important matters. Despite the widespread use of such indicators in the literature, uncertainty exists over how to construct valid indicators of empowerment based on questions about decision making. In particular, it is unclear how indicative joint decision making is of individual decision-making power and to what extent joint decision making reflects a consistent understanding of decision-making power within households. We utilize data from women and men in Bangladesh and Ghana to investigate whether respondents who report sole decision making in a particular domain tend to experience stronger or weaker feelings of autonomous motivation—measured using a Relative Autonomy Index—than those who report joint decision making. We find systematic differences between men and women in the association between feelings of autonomous motivation and decisionmaking outcomes. In addition, results vary by the domain of decision making and by whether or not there is a shared understanding of decision-making power within households. These findings suggest that in order to accurately measure empowerment, further innovation in the specificity as well as the sensitivity of indicators is needed. 2017 2024-06-21T09:25:04Z 2024-06-21T09:25:04Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148565 en https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147776 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148376 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/146458 application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Seymour, Gregory; and Peterman, Amber. 2017. Understanding the measurement of women’s autonomy: Illustrations from Bangladesh and Ghana. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1656. Washington, DC https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148565
spellingShingle gender
women's empowerment
decision making
women
Seymour, Gregory
Peterman, Amber
Understanding the measurement of women’s autonomy: Illustrations from Bangladesh and Ghana
title Understanding the measurement of women’s autonomy: Illustrations from Bangladesh and Ghana
title_full Understanding the measurement of women’s autonomy: Illustrations from Bangladesh and Ghana
title_fullStr Understanding the measurement of women’s autonomy: Illustrations from Bangladesh and Ghana
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the measurement of women’s autonomy: Illustrations from Bangladesh and Ghana
title_short Understanding the measurement of women’s autonomy: Illustrations from Bangladesh and Ghana
title_sort understanding the measurement of women s autonomy illustrations from bangladesh and ghana
topic gender
women's empowerment
decision making
women
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148565
work_keys_str_mv AT seymourgregory understandingthemeasurementofwomensautonomyillustrationsfrombangladeshandghana
AT petermanamber understandingthemeasurementofwomensautonomyillustrationsfrombangladeshandghana