Trading off nutrition and education? A panel data analysis of the dissimilar welfare effects of Organic and Fairtrade standards

Millions of smallholder farmers in developing countries participate in different types of sustainability standards. A growing body of literature has analyzed the welfare effects, with mixed results. Yet, there are important knowledge gaps. First, most existing studies have looked at the effects of o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meemken, Eva-Marie, Spielman, David J., Qaim, Matin
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148531
_version_ 1855536984834965504
author Meemken, Eva-Marie
Spielman, David J.
Qaim, Matin
author_browse Meemken, Eva-Marie
Qaim, Matin
Spielman, David J.
author_facet Meemken, Eva-Marie
Spielman, David J.
Qaim, Matin
author_sort Meemken, Eva-Marie
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Millions of smallholder farmers in developing countries participate in different types of sustainability standards. A growing body of literature has analyzed the welfare effects, with mixed results. Yet, there are important knowledge gaps. First, most existing studies have looked at the effects of one standard in one country. When comparing between studies it is unclear whether dissimilar outcomes are the result of different standards or different local conditions. Second, most studies have used cross-section data, so that selectivity issues remain a challenge. Third, existing work has primarily analyzed effects in terms of purely economic indicators, such as prices and income, ignoring other dimensions of household welfare. We address these shortcomings using panel data from small-scale coffee producers in Uganda and comparing the effects of two of the most popular sustainability standards, namely Organic and Fairtrade. Welfare effects are analyzed in terms of household expenditures, child education, and nutrition. Results show that Organic and Fairtrade both have positive effects on total consumption expenditures. However, notable differences are observed in terms of the other outcomes. Organic contributes to improved nutrition but has no effect on education. For Fairtrade it is exactly the other way around. We explore the mechanisms behind these differences.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace148531
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1485312025-02-24T06:46:47Z Trading off nutrition and education? A panel data analysis of the dissimilar welfare effects of Organic and Fairtrade standards Meemken, Eva-Marie Spielman, David J. Qaim, Matin education surveys food standards welfare nutrition Millions of smallholder farmers in developing countries participate in different types of sustainability standards. A growing body of literature has analyzed the welfare effects, with mixed results. Yet, there are important knowledge gaps. First, most existing studies have looked at the effects of one standard in one country. When comparing between studies it is unclear whether dissimilar outcomes are the result of different standards or different local conditions. Second, most studies have used cross-section data, so that selectivity issues remain a challenge. Third, existing work has primarily analyzed effects in terms of purely economic indicators, such as prices and income, ignoring other dimensions of household welfare. We address these shortcomings using panel data from small-scale coffee producers in Uganda and comparing the effects of two of the most popular sustainability standards, namely Organic and Fairtrade. Welfare effects are analyzed in terms of household expenditures, child education, and nutrition. Results show that Organic and Fairtrade both have positive effects on total consumption expenditures. However, notable differences are observed in terms of the other outcomes. Organic contributes to improved nutrition but has no effect on education. For Fairtrade it is exactly the other way around. We explore the mechanisms behind these differences. 2017-08 2024-06-21T09:24:56Z 2024-06-21T09:24:56Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148531 en https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.07.010 Open Access Elsevier Meemken, Eva-Marie; Spielman, David J.; and Qaim, Matin. 2017. Trading off nutrition and education? A panel data analysis of the dissimilar welfare effects of Organic and Fairtrade standards. Food Policy 71 (August 2017): 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.07.010
spellingShingle education
surveys
food standards
welfare
nutrition
Meemken, Eva-Marie
Spielman, David J.
Qaim, Matin
Trading off nutrition and education? A panel data analysis of the dissimilar welfare effects of Organic and Fairtrade standards
title Trading off nutrition and education? A panel data analysis of the dissimilar welfare effects of Organic and Fairtrade standards
title_full Trading off nutrition and education? A panel data analysis of the dissimilar welfare effects of Organic and Fairtrade standards
title_fullStr Trading off nutrition and education? A panel data analysis of the dissimilar welfare effects of Organic and Fairtrade standards
title_full_unstemmed Trading off nutrition and education? A panel data analysis of the dissimilar welfare effects of Organic and Fairtrade standards
title_short Trading off nutrition and education? A panel data analysis of the dissimilar welfare effects of Organic and Fairtrade standards
title_sort trading off nutrition and education a panel data analysis of the dissimilar welfare effects of organic and fairtrade standards
topic education
surveys
food standards
welfare
nutrition
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148531
work_keys_str_mv AT meemkenevamarie tradingoffnutritionandeducationapaneldataanalysisofthedissimilarwelfareeffectsoforganicandfairtradestandards
AT spielmandavidj tradingoffnutritionandeducationapaneldataanalysisofthedissimilarwelfareeffectsoforganicandfairtradestandards
AT qaimmatin tradingoffnutritionandeducationapaneldataanalysisofthedissimilarwelfareeffectsoforganicandfairtradestandards