Framework to assess performance and impact of pluralistic agricultural extension systems: The best-fit framework revisited
Extension and advisory services (EAS) are well recognized as a key factor in contributing to agricultural productivity and growth. However, rigorous evaluation of EAS approaches and assessment of complex national or subnational pluralistic EAS systems are rare. This working paper examines the litera...
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo preliminar |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147676 |
Ejemplares similares: Framework to assess performance and impact of pluralistic agricultural extension systems: The best-fit framework revisited
- From "best practice" to "best fit": A framework for designing and analyzing pluralistic agricultural advisory services worldwide
- Comparison of national extension systems: Application of the best-fit framework
- Conclusions and policy implications [In Agricultural Extension]
- From "best practice" to "best fit": A framework for designing and analyzing pluralistic agricultural advisory services
- From best practice to best fit: A framework for designing and analyzing pluralistic agricultural advisory services worldwide
- Agricultural extension: Global status and performance in selected countries