Entitlement fetching or snatching? Effects of arbitrage on India’s public distribution system
Would households be able to buy more subsidized grains from a food-based safety-net program if the difference between prices in the program and in the open market were to increase? This is an important question for safety-net programs anywhere in the world, but particularly so for the public distrib...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo preliminar |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147558 |
Similar Items: Entitlement fetching or snatching? Effects of arbitrage on India’s public distribution system
- Effectiveness of food subsidies in raising healthy food consumption: Public distribution of pulses in India
- Effectiveness of food subsidies in raising healthy food consumption: Public distribution of pulses in India
- Is more inclusive more effective? The ‘New Style’ public distribution system in India
- Is more inclusive more effective? The “new-style” public distribution system in India
- Enhancing WFP’s capacity and experience to design, implement, monitor, and evaluate vouchers and cash transfer programmes: Study summary
- India’s right to food act: A novel approach to food security