Livelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting?
Chapter 8 provides a comparative analysis of 48 graduation, livelihood, and cash transfer programs. Using income and consumption as the primary metrics of impact and focusing on long-term outcomes, the author assesses the sustainability of impact of these programs and compares both costs and impacts...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Capítulo de libro |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147363 |
| _version_ | 1855514282507108352 |
|---|---|
| author | Sulaiman, Munshi |
| author_browse | Sulaiman, Munshi |
| author_facet | Sulaiman, Munshi |
| author_sort | Sulaiman, Munshi |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Chapter 8 provides a comparative analysis of 48 graduation, livelihood, and cash transfer programs. Using income and consumption as the primary metrics of impact and focusing on long-term outcomes, the author assesses the sustainability of impact of these programs and compares both costs and impacts across the three types of approaches. |
| format | Book Chapter |
| id | CGSpace147363 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateRange | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| publisherStr | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1473632025-11-06T03:51:54Z Livelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? Sulaiman, Munshi income costs education economic growth programmes consumption cost benefit analysis social policies social welfare livelihoods rural development cash transfers poverty project evaluation Chapter 8 provides a comparative analysis of 48 graduation, livelihood, and cash transfer programs. Using income and consumption as the primary metrics of impact and focusing on long-term outcomes, the author assesses the sustainability of impact of these programs and compares both costs and impacts across the three types of approaches. 2018-10-04 2024-06-21T09:13:37Z 2024-06-21T09:13:37Z Book Chapter https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147363 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Sulaiman, Munshi. 2018. Livelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? In Boosting growth to end hunger by 2025: The role of social protection, eds. Fleur Stephanie Wouterse and Alemayehu Seyoum Taffesse. Chapter 8, Pp. 102-120. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147363 |
| spellingShingle | income costs education economic growth programmes consumption cost benefit analysis social policies social welfare livelihoods rural development cash transfers poverty project evaluation Sulaiman, Munshi Livelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? |
| title | Livelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? |
| title_full | Livelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? |
| title_fullStr | Livelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Livelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? |
| title_short | Livelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? |
| title_sort | livelihood cash transfer and graduation approaches how do they compare in terms of cost impact and targeting |
| topic | income costs education economic growth programmes consumption cost benefit analysis social policies social welfare livelihoods rural development cash transfers poverty project evaluation |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147363 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sulaimanmunshi livelihoodcashtransferandgraduationapproacheshowdotheycompareintermsofcostimpactandtargeting |