Is consanguinity an impediment to child development outcomes?

Marriages between blood relatives – also known as consanguineous unions – are widespread in North Africa, Central and West Asia and most parts of South Asia. Researchers have suggested that consanguinity has adverse effects on child development, but assessing its impact is not straightforward as the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mete, Cem, Bossavie, Laurent, Giles, John, Alderman, Harold
Formato: Artículo preliminar
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Institute of Labor Economics 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147310
_version_ 1855523316055408640
author Mete, Cem
Bossavie, Laurent
Giles, John
Alderman, Harold
author_browse Alderman, Harold
Bossavie, Laurent
Giles, John
Mete, Cem
author_facet Mete, Cem
Bossavie, Laurent
Giles, John
Alderman, Harold
author_sort Mete, Cem
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Marriages between blood relatives – also known as consanguineous unions – are widespread in North Africa, Central and West Asia and most parts of South Asia. Researchers have suggested that consanguinity has adverse effects on child development, but assessing its impact is not straightforward as the decision to marry a relative might be endogenous to other socio-economic factors. Using a unique dataset collected in rural Pakistan, this paper assesses the extent to which consanguinity is linked to child cognitive ability and nutritional status. As economic benefits of marrying cousins may lead to upward bias to estimates of the effects of consanguinity on child outcomes, prior work likely underestimates the negative impacts of consanguinity on child outcomes. After controlling for current household wealth and parent education, this paper exploits (current and past) grandfather land ownership and maternal grandparent mortality to identify the effect of endogenous consanguinity on child cognitive ability and height-for-age. Children born into consanguineous unions have lower cognitive scores, lower height-for-age, and a higher likelihood of being severely stunted. More importantly, adverse effects are significantly larger after accounting for the endogeneity of consanguineous unions, suggesting that negative impacts on child development are substantial, and likely to be larger than suggested in previous studies. Reducing incentives for consanguineous unions should therefore be of concern among policy makers aiming at improving child development outcomes where marrying cousins is common.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace147310
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2019
publishDateRange 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Institute of Labor Economics
publisherStr Institute of Labor Economics
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1473102025-02-24T06:49:34Z Is consanguinity an impediment to child development outcomes? Mete, Cem Bossavie, Laurent Giles, John Alderman, Harold child development households families socioeconomic environment malnutrition disabilities mental ability family structure consanguinity marriage decision making Marriages between blood relatives – also known as consanguineous unions – are widespread in North Africa, Central and West Asia and most parts of South Asia. Researchers have suggested that consanguinity has adverse effects on child development, but assessing its impact is not straightforward as the decision to marry a relative might be endogenous to other socio-economic factors. Using a unique dataset collected in rural Pakistan, this paper assesses the extent to which consanguinity is linked to child cognitive ability and nutritional status. As economic benefits of marrying cousins may lead to upward bias to estimates of the effects of consanguinity on child outcomes, prior work likely underestimates the negative impacts of consanguinity on child outcomes. After controlling for current household wealth and parent education, this paper exploits (current and past) grandfather land ownership and maternal grandparent mortality to identify the effect of endogenous consanguinity on child cognitive ability and height-for-age. Children born into consanguineous unions have lower cognitive scores, lower height-for-age, and a higher likelihood of being severely stunted. More importantly, adverse effects are significantly larger after accounting for the endogeneity of consanguineous unions, suggesting that negative impacts on child development are substantial, and likely to be larger than suggested in previous studies. Reducing incentives for consanguineous unions should therefore be of concern among policy makers aiming at improving child development outcomes where marrying cousins is common. 2019-12-31 2024-06-21T09:13:10Z 2024-06-21T09:13:10Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147310 en https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2019.1699942 Open Access Institute of Labor Economics Mete, Cem; Bossavie, Laurent; Giles, John; and Alderman, Harold. 2019. Is consanguinity an impediment to child development outcomes? IZA Discussion Papers No. 12665. http://ftp.iza.org/dp12665.pdf
spellingShingle child development
households
families
socioeconomic environment
malnutrition
disabilities
mental ability
family structure
consanguinity
marriage
decision making
Mete, Cem
Bossavie, Laurent
Giles, John
Alderman, Harold
Is consanguinity an impediment to child development outcomes?
title Is consanguinity an impediment to child development outcomes?
title_full Is consanguinity an impediment to child development outcomes?
title_fullStr Is consanguinity an impediment to child development outcomes?
title_full_unstemmed Is consanguinity an impediment to child development outcomes?
title_short Is consanguinity an impediment to child development outcomes?
title_sort is consanguinity an impediment to child development outcomes
topic child development
households
families
socioeconomic environment
malnutrition
disabilities
mental ability
family structure
consanguinity
marriage
decision making
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147310
work_keys_str_mv AT metecem isconsanguinityanimpedimenttochilddevelopmentoutcomes
AT bossavielaurent isconsanguinityanimpedimenttochilddevelopmentoutcomes
AT gilesjohn isconsanguinityanimpedimenttochilddevelopmentoutcomes
AT aldermanharold isconsanguinityanimpedimenttochilddevelopmentoutcomes