Evaluating the welfare effects of nonfarm enterprises on rural households in Papua New Guinea

Papua New Guinea (PNG) is the country with the largest rural population share in the East Asia and Pacific region. In addition, PNG is affected by El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) climatic events that in severe years cause significant food insecurity due to failed agricultural production. Shrinki...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmidt, Emily, Rosenbach, Gracie, Mueller, Valerie
Formato: Brief
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Food Policy Research Institute 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/146897
_version_ 1855525969033428992
author Schmidt, Emily
Rosenbach, Gracie
Mueller, Valerie
author_browse Mueller, Valerie
Rosenbach, Gracie
Schmidt, Emily
author_facet Schmidt, Emily
Rosenbach, Gracie
Mueller, Valerie
author_sort Schmidt, Emily
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Papua New Guinea (PNG) is the country with the largest rural population share in the East Asia and Pacific region. In addition, PNG is affected by El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) climatic events that in severe years cause significant food insecurity due to failed agricultural production. Shrinking land holdings for agricultural production due to the growing population together with climate risk motivates many rural households to explore off-farm income generating opportunities. The analysis reported on here evaluates the importance of nonfarm employment in rural areas in PNG in diversifying risk to household welfare (associated with weather shocks, crop pests and diseases, agricultural price fluctuations, etc.), in smoothing seasonal income fluctuations, and in absorbing excess labor in households with limited agricultural resources. Our study draws upon a wide-ranging literature focused on the role of nonfarm enterprises in the livelihood strategies of rural households globally, e.g., de Janvry and Sadoulet 2001; Lanjouw and Lanjouw 2001; Jayne et al. 2003; Barrett et al. 2005; Haggblade et al. 2007; Lay et al. 2008. We use data collected from rural households in PNG between May and July 2018 by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). The survey was administered to 1,026 households in 70 communities across specific districts in East Sepik, Madang, and West Sepik provinces and in the Autonomous Region of Bougainville. Respondent households were asked detailed questions about any nonfarm enterprises (NFE) in which they were involved, including questions on ownership, labor characteristics, and income generation. We explore how engaging in an NFE affects household welfare. In doing so, we evaluate two questions: 1) What barriers to entry exist for male- versus female-owned NFEs? 2) Do the welfare effects of NFE ownership differ by the sex of the owner? Overall, we find that households with an NFE have significantly higher annual per capita consumption compared to matched households without an NFE, amounting to an average increase in the value of annual household consumption of 180 kina (PGK) per capita. In addition, households with an NFE consume approximately 9.5 grams more protein per person per day and achieve greater diversity in their diets compared to households without an NFE. We find that the positive effects of NFE ownership on welfare outcomes are largely driven by male-owned and jointly-owned (male and female) NFEs. The welfare outcomes attributable to female-owned NFEs are much smaller.
format Brief
id CGSpace146897
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2019
publishDateRange 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1468972025-11-06T06:17:36Z Evaluating the welfare effects of nonfarm enterprises on rural households in Papua New Guinea Schmidt, Emily Rosenbach, Gracie Mueller, Valerie nonfarm income households welfare capacity development climate risk ancillary enterprises drought diet rural areas climate change dietary diversity Papua New Guinea (PNG) is the country with the largest rural population share in the East Asia and Pacific region. In addition, PNG is affected by El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) climatic events that in severe years cause significant food insecurity due to failed agricultural production. Shrinking land holdings for agricultural production due to the growing population together with climate risk motivates many rural households to explore off-farm income generating opportunities. The analysis reported on here evaluates the importance of nonfarm employment in rural areas in PNG in diversifying risk to household welfare (associated with weather shocks, crop pests and diseases, agricultural price fluctuations, etc.), in smoothing seasonal income fluctuations, and in absorbing excess labor in households with limited agricultural resources. Our study draws upon a wide-ranging literature focused on the role of nonfarm enterprises in the livelihood strategies of rural households globally, e.g., de Janvry and Sadoulet 2001; Lanjouw and Lanjouw 2001; Jayne et al. 2003; Barrett et al. 2005; Haggblade et al. 2007; Lay et al. 2008. We use data collected from rural households in PNG between May and July 2018 by the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). The survey was administered to 1,026 households in 70 communities across specific districts in East Sepik, Madang, and West Sepik provinces and in the Autonomous Region of Bougainville. Respondent households were asked detailed questions about any nonfarm enterprises (NFE) in which they were involved, including questions on ownership, labor characteristics, and income generation. We explore how engaging in an NFE affects household welfare. In doing so, we evaluate two questions: 1) What barriers to entry exist for male- versus female-owned NFEs? 2) Do the welfare effects of NFE ownership differ by the sex of the owner? Overall, we find that households with an NFE have significantly higher annual per capita consumption compared to matched households without an NFE, amounting to an average increase in the value of annual household consumption of 180 kina (PGK) per capita. In addition, households with an NFE consume approximately 9.5 grams more protein per person per day and achieve greater diversity in their diets compared to households without an NFE. We find that the positive effects of NFE ownership on welfare outcomes are largely driven by male-owned and jointly-owned (male and female) NFEs. The welfare outcomes attributable to female-owned NFEs are much smaller. 2019-07-30 2024-06-21T09:09:25Z 2024-06-21T09:09:25Z Brief https://hdl.handle.net/10568/146897 en https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101964 Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Schmidt, Emily; Rosenbach, Gracie; and Mueller, Valerie. 2019. Evaluating the welfare effects of nonfarm enterprises on rural households in Papua New Guinea. Papua New Guinea Project Note 4. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/146897
spellingShingle nonfarm income
households
welfare
capacity development
climate risk
ancillary enterprises
drought
diet
rural areas
climate change
dietary diversity
Schmidt, Emily
Rosenbach, Gracie
Mueller, Valerie
Evaluating the welfare effects of nonfarm enterprises on rural households in Papua New Guinea
title Evaluating the welfare effects of nonfarm enterprises on rural households in Papua New Guinea
title_full Evaluating the welfare effects of nonfarm enterprises on rural households in Papua New Guinea
title_fullStr Evaluating the welfare effects of nonfarm enterprises on rural households in Papua New Guinea
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the welfare effects of nonfarm enterprises on rural households in Papua New Guinea
title_short Evaluating the welfare effects of nonfarm enterprises on rural households in Papua New Guinea
title_sort evaluating the welfare effects of nonfarm enterprises on rural households in papua new guinea
topic nonfarm income
households
welfare
capacity development
climate risk
ancillary enterprises
drought
diet
rural areas
climate change
dietary diversity
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/146897
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidtemily evaluatingthewelfareeffectsofnonfarmenterprisesonruralhouseholdsinpapuanewguinea
AT rosenbachgracie evaluatingthewelfareeffectsofnonfarmenterprisesonruralhouseholdsinpapuanewguinea
AT muellervalerie evaluatingthewelfareeffectsofnonfarmenterprisesonruralhouseholdsinpapuanewguinea