Do shocks affect men's and women's assets differently? Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda
Using panel data, this article tests whether shocks affect men's and women's assets differently in Bangladesh and Uganda. Across countries, covariate and idiosyncratic shocks have different effects on men's, women's and jointly owned assets. Jointly held land and assets were better insured against f...
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/146788 |
Ejemplares similares: Do shocks affect men's and women's assets differently? Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda
- Do shocks affect men's and women's assets differently? A review of literature and new evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda
- Do shocks affect men’s and women’s assets differently? Evidence from Bangladesh and Uganda
- Do men and women accumulate assets in different ways? Evidence from rural Bangladesh
- Poverty transitions, shocks, and consumption in rural Bangladesh: Preliminary results from a longitudinal household survey
- Impact of- and lessons learned from WFP's nutrition-sensitive, shock-responsive food assistance for assets program in Sri Lanka on men's and women's dietary intake
- The impact of shocks on gender-differentiated asset dynamics in Bangladesh