Are Malawi’s maize and soya trade restrictions causing more harm than good? A summary of evidence and practical alternatives
Since the early 2000s, the government of Malawi has used trade restrictions, export bans in particular, to control trade flows for maize and soya, among other crops. Maize export bans, justified in the name of national food security, have been in place more or less continuously since 2005, with the...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Brief |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/146355 |
Similar Items: Are Malawi’s maize and soya trade restrictions causing more harm than good? A summary of evidence and practical alternatives
- Discretionary maize policy interventions in Malawi: An impact analysis of export bans and minimum farm gate prices
- Boycotting China: More symbolic than punitive — start designing policies which support Atmanirbhar Bharat
- Looking at export tariffs and export restrictions: The case of Argentina
- How ‘reciprocal tariffs’ harm agricultural trade
- India's rice export restrictions and BIMSTEC countries: Implications and recommendations
- Is a negative US agricultural trade balance a cause for concern?