Applying the best-fit framework to assess and strengthen national extension and advisory services

Agricultural extension and advisory services are critical to supporting technological and institutional changes that can improve the livelihoods of small-scale farmers in developing countries. However, many extension services are under-resourced, out of date, and need of structural and content chang...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Davis, Kristin E., Spielman, David J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:Inglés
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/146349
_version_ 1855542291144376320
author Davis, Kristin E.
Spielman, David J.
author_browse Davis, Kristin E.
Spielman, David J.
author_facet Davis, Kristin E.
Spielman, David J.
author_sort Davis, Kristin E.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Agricultural extension and advisory services are critical to supporting technological and institutional changes that can improve the livelihoods of small-scale farmers in developing countries. However, many extension services are under-resourced, out of date, and need of structural and content changes. However, efforts to systematically strengthen local extension systems often fall into the trap of promoting blueprints that are insufficiently adapted to local context. To that end, researchers developed the best-fit framework in the 2000s to provide impetus for pursuit of more locally-tailored extension solutions. Today, almost a decade later, researchers test the framework under real-world conditions in a cross-country application. This paper examines the application of this framework across six dimensions and seven countries to formulate a set of best-fit recommendations that are also broadly appreciable. The findings show that it is possible to apply the framework to the analysis of EAS across countries while also maintaining a very localized perspective on recommendations. Across the seven countries, certain obvious commonalities exist: The growth in pluralism in extension providers, the persistence of weak incentives for extension agents, and the lack of enabling policies. At the same time, innovative solutions to many of the challenges held in common—ICT-enabled extension, performance incentives, and value-chain oriented extension—are heterogeneous. The framework allows users to pursue change processes in EAS in response to their own local realities.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace146349
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1463492025-08-01T16:50:16Z Applying the best-fit framework to assess and strengthen national extension and advisory services Davis, Kristin E. Spielman, David J. extension programmes agricultural extension regional policies Agricultural extension and advisory services are critical to supporting technological and institutional changes that can improve the livelihoods of small-scale farmers in developing countries. However, many extension services are under-resourced, out of date, and need of structural and content changes. However, efforts to systematically strengthen local extension systems often fall into the trap of promoting blueprints that are insufficiently adapted to local context. To that end, researchers developed the best-fit framework in the 2000s to provide impetus for pursuit of more locally-tailored extension solutions. Today, almost a decade later, researchers test the framework under real-world conditions in a cross-country application. This paper examines the application of this framework across six dimensions and seven countries to formulate a set of best-fit recommendations that are also broadly appreciable. The findings show that it is possible to apply the framework to the analysis of EAS across countries while also maintaining a very localized perspective on recommendations. Across the seven countries, certain obvious commonalities exist: The growth in pluralism in extension providers, the persistence of weak incentives for extension agents, and the lack of enabling policies. At the same time, innovative solutions to many of the challenges held in common—ICT-enabled extension, performance incentives, and value-chain oriented extension—are heterogeneous. The framework allows users to pursue change processes in EAS in response to their own local realities. 2017 2024-06-21T09:06:44Z 2024-06-21T09:06:44Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/146349 en Open Access Davis, Kristin; and Spielman, David J. 2017. Applying the best-fit framework to assess and strengthen national extension and advisory services. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education 24(3). https://doi.org/10.5191/jiaee.2017.24307
spellingShingle extension programmes
agricultural extension
regional policies
Davis, Kristin E.
Spielman, David J.
Applying the best-fit framework to assess and strengthen national extension and advisory services
title Applying the best-fit framework to assess and strengthen national extension and advisory services
title_full Applying the best-fit framework to assess and strengthen national extension and advisory services
title_fullStr Applying the best-fit framework to assess and strengthen national extension and advisory services
title_full_unstemmed Applying the best-fit framework to assess and strengthen national extension and advisory services
title_short Applying the best-fit framework to assess and strengthen national extension and advisory services
title_sort applying the best fit framework to assess and strengthen national extension and advisory services
topic extension programmes
agricultural extension
regional policies
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/146349
work_keys_str_mv AT daviskristine applyingthebestfitframeworktoassessandstrengthennationalextensionandadvisoryservices
AT spielmandavidj applyingthebestfitframeworktoassessandstrengthennationalextensionandadvisoryservices