Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103
The paper by Garcia and Wanner reviews examples of genderresponsive research and programming from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to discuss those genderresponsive approaches which are most successful for achieving women’s empowerment...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Springer
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/145686 |
| _version_ | 1855515338264805376 |
|---|---|
| author | Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. Quisumbing, Agnes R. |
| author_browse | Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. Quisumbing, Agnes R. |
| author_facet | Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. Quisumbing, Agnes R. |
| author_sort | Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | The paper by Garcia and Wanner reviews examples of genderresponsive research and programming from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to discuss those genderresponsive approaches which are most successful for achieving women’s empowerment in agricultural development. It notes accomplishments and points out some shortcomings for both organizations to address. Although the objectives of the paper are worthwhile, we note important problems regarding methodology used, factual errors, and misrepresentation. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace145686 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateRange | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | Springer |
| publisherStr | Springer |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1456862024-10-25T07:53:29Z Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103 Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. Quisumbing, Agnes R. gender evaluation agricultural development food security equality methodology The paper by Garcia and Wanner reviews examples of genderresponsive research and programming from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to discuss those genderresponsive approaches which are most successful for achieving women’s empowerment in agricultural development. It notes accomplishments and points out some shortcomings for both organizations to address. Although the objectives of the paper are worthwhile, we note important problems regarding methodology used, factual errors, and misrepresentation. 2018-01-30 2024-06-21T09:04:53Z 2024-06-21T09:04:53Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/145686 en Open Access Springer Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela; and Quisumbing, Agnes R. 2018. Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103. Food Security 10(2): 247-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0766-7 |
| spellingShingle | gender evaluation agricultural development food security equality methodology Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. Quisumbing, Agnes R. Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103 |
| title | Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103 |
| title_full | Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103 |
| title_fullStr | Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103 |
| title_short | Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103 |
| title_sort | response to garcia and wanner gender inequality and food security lessons for the gender responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the bill and melinda gates foundation food security 2017 9 1091 1103 |
| topic | gender evaluation agricultural development food security equality methodology |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/145686 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT meinzendickruths responsetogarciaandwannergenderinequalityandfoodsecuritylessonsforthegenderresponsiveworkoftheinternationalfoodpolicyresearchinstituteandthebillandmelindagatesfoundationfoodsecurity2017910911103 AT quisumbingagnesr responsetogarciaandwannergenderinequalityandfoodsecuritylessonsforthegenderresponsiveworkoftheinternationalfoodpolicyresearchinstituteandthebillandmelindagatesfoundationfoodsecurity2017910911103 |