Quantifying the cost and benefits of ending hunger and undernutrition: Examining the differences among alternative approaches
This brief examines estimates produced by several recent model simulations and frameworks that focus on the cost of ending hunger as well as progress toward other development goals—estimates that range from US$7 billion to US$265 billion per year. The differences among these estimates are largely at...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Brief |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/145639 |
Similar Items: Quantifying the cost and benefits of ending hunger and undernutrition: Examining the differences among alternative approaches
- Partial Equilibrium Trade Simulation (PETS) Model: Documentation
- Why is the Doha development agenda failing? And what can be done? A computable general equilibrium-game theoretical approach
- Sensitivity of computable general equilibrium models to macroeconomic closure rules: Evidence from the IFPRI standard mode
- Modeling impacts of faster productivity growth to inform the CGIAR initiative on crops to end hunger
- Why is the Doha development agenda failing? And what can be done? A computable general equilibrium-game theoretical approach
- US trade wars with emerging countries in the 21st century: Make America and Its partners lose again