Payment modality preferences: Evidence from Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Programme
Economists typically default to the assumption that cash is always preferable to an in-kind transfer. We extend the classic Southworth (1945) framework to predict under what conditions this assumption holds. We take the model to longitudinal household data from Ethiopia where a large-scale social sa...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo preliminar |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/145532 |
Similar Items: Payment modality preferences: Evidence from Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Programme
- Beneficiary views on cash and in-kind payments: Evidence from Ethiopia's Productive Safety Net Programme
- Beneficiary views on cash and in-kind payments: Evidence from Ethiopia’s productive safety net programme
- Costing alternative transfer modalities
- Costing alternative transfer modalities
- Sustainable poverty reduction through social assistance: Modality, context, and complementary programming in Bangladesh
- Much ado about modalities: Multicountry experiments on the effects of cash and food transfers on consumption patterns