Micro-econometric and Micro-Macro linked models: Impact of the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) Program of Uganda—Considering different levels of likely contamination with the treatment

An important problem in causal inference and estimation of treatment effects is identifying a reliable comparison group (control observations) against which to compare those that have been exposed to the treatment (treated observations). It is common knowledge that the estimate obtained by the diffe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benin, Samuel, Nkonya, Ephraim M., Okecho, Geresom, Randriamamonjy, Josee, Kato, Edward, Lubade, Geofrey, Kyotalimye, Miriam
Formato: Capítulo de libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Springer 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/145426
_version_ 1855513348691460096
author Benin, Samuel
Nkonya, Ephraim M.
Okecho, Geresom
Randriamamonjy, Josee
Kato, Edward
Lubade, Geofrey
Kyotalimye, Miriam
author_browse Benin, Samuel
Kato, Edward
Kyotalimye, Miriam
Lubade, Geofrey
Nkonya, Ephraim M.
Okecho, Geresom
Randriamamonjy, Josee
author_facet Benin, Samuel
Nkonya, Ephraim M.
Okecho, Geresom
Randriamamonjy, Josee
Kato, Edward
Lubade, Geofrey
Kyotalimye, Miriam
author_sort Benin, Samuel
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description An important problem in causal inference and estimation of treatment effects is identifying a reliable comparison group (control observations) against which to compare those that have been exposed to the treatment (treated observations). It is common knowledge that the estimate obtained by the difference in the values of the indicator of interest associated with the two groups could be biased due to lack of overlap in the covariate distributions or common support between the treated and control observations (Dehejia and Wahba 2002; Imbens and Wooldridge 2009). This is especially problematic with non-experimental control observations (Dehejia and Wahba 2002) in which case combining propensity score matching and regression methods has been suggested to yield more consistent estimates of the treatment effect than using either method alone (Imbens and Wooldridge 2009). Matching removes self-selection bias due to any correlation between the observable (pre-treatment) covariates and the dependent variable, while regression isolates the effect of change in the covariates on change in the dependent variable over the period of the treatment. Using the combined approach, this paper discusses the effect of using different sets of control groups on estimates of treatment effects of the agricultural extension system in Uganda, the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) program.
format Book Chapter
id CGSpace145426
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2018
publishDateRange 2018
publishDateSort 2018
publisher Springer
publisherStr Springer
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1454262025-12-08T10:29:22Z Micro-econometric and Micro-Macro linked models: Impact of the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) Program of Uganda—Considering different levels of likely contamination with the treatment Benin, Samuel Nkonya, Ephraim M. Okecho, Geresom Randriamamonjy, Josee Kato, Edward Lubade, Geofrey Kyotalimye, Miriam agricultural extension development policies caadp evaluation economic policies policy analysis quantitative analysis impact assessment An important problem in causal inference and estimation of treatment effects is identifying a reliable comparison group (control observations) against which to compare those that have been exposed to the treatment (treated observations). It is common knowledge that the estimate obtained by the difference in the values of the indicator of interest associated with the two groups could be biased due to lack of overlap in the covariate distributions or common support between the treated and control observations (Dehejia and Wahba 2002; Imbens and Wooldridge 2009). This is especially problematic with non-experimental control observations (Dehejia and Wahba 2002) in which case combining propensity score matching and regression methods has been suggested to yield more consistent estimates of the treatment effect than using either method alone (Imbens and Wooldridge 2009). Matching removes self-selection bias due to any correlation between the observable (pre-treatment) covariates and the dependent variable, while regression isolates the effect of change in the covariates on change in the dependent variable over the period of the treatment. Using the combined approach, this paper discusses the effect of using different sets of control groups on estimates of treatment effects of the agricultural extension system in Uganda, the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) program. 2018-01-10 2024-06-21T09:04:29Z 2024-06-21T09:04:29Z Book Chapter https://hdl.handle.net/10568/145426 en https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aar094 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60714-6 Open Access Springer Benin, Samuel; Nkonya, Ephraim M.; Okecho, Geresom; Randriamamonjy, Josée; Kato, Edward; Lubade, Geofrey; and Kyotalimye, Miriam. 2018. Micro-econometric and Micro-Macro linked models: Impact of the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) Program of Uganda—Considering different levels of likely contamination with the treatment. In Development policies and policy processes in Africa: Modeling and evaluation, eds. Christian Henning, Ousmane Badiane, and Eva Krampe. Pp 85-98. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60714-6_4
spellingShingle agricultural extension
development policies
caadp
evaluation
economic policies
policy analysis
quantitative analysis
impact assessment
Benin, Samuel
Nkonya, Ephraim M.
Okecho, Geresom
Randriamamonjy, Josee
Kato, Edward
Lubade, Geofrey
Kyotalimye, Miriam
Micro-econometric and Micro-Macro linked models: Impact of the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) Program of Uganda—Considering different levels of likely contamination with the treatment
title Micro-econometric and Micro-Macro linked models: Impact of the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) Program of Uganda—Considering different levels of likely contamination with the treatment
title_full Micro-econometric and Micro-Macro linked models: Impact of the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) Program of Uganda—Considering different levels of likely contamination with the treatment
title_fullStr Micro-econometric and Micro-Macro linked models: Impact of the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) Program of Uganda—Considering different levels of likely contamination with the treatment
title_full_unstemmed Micro-econometric and Micro-Macro linked models: Impact of the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) Program of Uganda—Considering different levels of likely contamination with the treatment
title_short Micro-econometric and Micro-Macro linked models: Impact of the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) Program of Uganda—Considering different levels of likely contamination with the treatment
title_sort micro econometric and micro macro linked models impact of the national agricultural advisory services naads program of uganda considering different levels of likely contamination with the treatment
topic agricultural extension
development policies
caadp
evaluation
economic policies
policy analysis
quantitative analysis
impact assessment
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/145426
work_keys_str_mv AT beninsamuel microeconometricandmicromacrolinkedmodelsimpactofthenationalagriculturaladvisoryservicesnaadsprogramofugandaconsideringdifferentlevelsoflikelycontaminationwiththetreatment
AT nkonyaephraimm microeconometricandmicromacrolinkedmodelsimpactofthenationalagriculturaladvisoryservicesnaadsprogramofugandaconsideringdifferentlevelsoflikelycontaminationwiththetreatment
AT okechogeresom microeconometricandmicromacrolinkedmodelsimpactofthenationalagriculturaladvisoryservicesnaadsprogramofugandaconsideringdifferentlevelsoflikelycontaminationwiththetreatment
AT randriamamonjyjosee microeconometricandmicromacrolinkedmodelsimpactofthenationalagriculturaladvisoryservicesnaadsprogramofugandaconsideringdifferentlevelsoflikelycontaminationwiththetreatment
AT katoedward microeconometricandmicromacrolinkedmodelsimpactofthenationalagriculturaladvisoryservicesnaadsprogramofugandaconsideringdifferentlevelsoflikelycontaminationwiththetreatment
AT lubadegeofrey microeconometricandmicromacrolinkedmodelsimpactofthenationalagriculturaladvisoryservicesnaadsprogramofugandaconsideringdifferentlevelsoflikelycontaminationwiththetreatment
AT kyotalimyemiriam microeconometricandmicromacrolinkedmodelsimpactofthenationalagriculturaladvisoryservicesnaadsprogramofugandaconsideringdifferentlevelsoflikelycontaminationwiththetreatment