Governance of natural resources: Highlights, lessons learned, and priorities for One CGIAR
What are the drivers and consequences of tenure insecurity? PIM research under Flagship 5 addressed drivers and consequences of tenure insecurity from three angles: women’s rights, individual or household rights, and collective rights (where ownership or long-term use and/or management rights have b...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Brief |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143955 |
Ejemplares similares: Governance of natural resources: Highlights, lessons learned, and priorities for One CGIAR
- Polycentricity and multi-stakeholder platforms: Governance of the commons in India
- Mobilizing governance structures for agroecological transitions: The case of agroecological living landscapes in five countries
- Smallholders and land tenure in Ghana: Aligning context, empirics, and policy
- How are we doing? A tool to reflect on the process, progress and priorities of your multi-stakeholder forum
- Multistakeholder platforms for natural resource governance: Lessons from eight landscape-level cases
- Polycentric governance of commons through multi-stakeholder platforms: Insights from two case studies in India