Spousal concordance in joint and separate households: Survey evidence from Nepal

Using data from Nepal, we analyze patterns of concordance between spouses on survey questions regarding asset ownership and decision making separately for households in which a respondent couple lives with the husband’s parents and those in which they do not. We consider concordance regarding both t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ambler, Kate, Doss, Cheryl R., Kieran, Caitlin, Passarelli, Simone
Formato: Artículo preliminar
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Food Policy Research Institute 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143541
_version_ 1855527186187943936
author Ambler, Kate
Doss, Cheryl R.
Kieran, Caitlin
Passarelli, Simone
author_browse Ambler, Kate
Doss, Cheryl R.
Kieran, Caitlin
Passarelli, Simone
author_facet Ambler, Kate
Doss, Cheryl R.
Kieran, Caitlin
Passarelli, Simone
author_sort Ambler, Kate
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Using data from Nepal, we analyze patterns of concordance between spouses on survey questions regarding asset ownership and decision making separately for households in which a respondent couple lives with the husband’s parents and those in which they do not. We consider concordance regarding both the roles of women respondents and the roles of people other than the respondent couple. We find that discordance regarding women’s roles is both substantial and systematic; women are much more likely than men to report women’s participation in asset ownership and decision making, and this qualitative pattern is similar across household types. Regarding the role of others, the modal response in joint households is concordance that others own assets and make decisions. However, women are more likely than men to acknowledge this role of others. Next, we find that spousal concordance that women have a role, and wives reporting they have a role while their husbands say that they do not, are both correlated with some improved measures of well-being. In households with in-laws present, concordance that others are involved is correlated with worse outcomes for women. These results highlight that spousal concordance is not necessarily indicative of women's well-being, especially in joint households.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace143541
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1435412025-12-02T21:02:52Z Spousal concordance in joint and separate households: Survey evidence from Nepal Ambler, Kate Doss, Cheryl R. Kieran, Caitlin Passarelli, Simone role of women gender households measurement assets ownership decision making women Using data from Nepal, we analyze patterns of concordance between spouses on survey questions regarding asset ownership and decision making separately for households in which a respondent couple lives with the husband’s parents and those in which they do not. We consider concordance regarding both the roles of women respondents and the roles of people other than the respondent couple. We find that discordance regarding women’s roles is both substantial and systematic; women are much more likely than men to report women’s participation in asset ownership and decision making, and this qualitative pattern is similar across household types. Regarding the role of others, the modal response in joint households is concordance that others own assets and make decisions. However, women are more likely than men to acknowledge this role of others. Next, we find that spousal concordance that women have a role, and wives reporting they have a role while their husbands say that they do not, are both correlated with some improved measures of well-being. In households with in-laws present, concordance that others are involved is correlated with worse outcomes for women. These results highlight that spousal concordance is not necessarily indicative of women's well-being, especially in joint households. 2020-07-01 2024-05-22T12:14:57Z 2024-05-22T12:14:57Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143541 en https://doi.org/10.1086/703082 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104671 https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2019.1681591 Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Ambler, Kate; Doss, Cheryl; Kieran, Caitlin; and Passarelli, Simone. 2020. Spousal concordance in joint and separate households: Survey evidence from Nepal. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1958. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133900.
spellingShingle role of women
gender
households
measurement
assets
ownership
decision making
women
Ambler, Kate
Doss, Cheryl R.
Kieran, Caitlin
Passarelli, Simone
Spousal concordance in joint and separate households: Survey evidence from Nepal
title Spousal concordance in joint and separate households: Survey evidence from Nepal
title_full Spousal concordance in joint and separate households: Survey evidence from Nepal
title_fullStr Spousal concordance in joint and separate households: Survey evidence from Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Spousal concordance in joint and separate households: Survey evidence from Nepal
title_short Spousal concordance in joint and separate households: Survey evidence from Nepal
title_sort spousal concordance in joint and separate households survey evidence from nepal
topic role of women
gender
households
measurement
assets
ownership
decision making
women
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143541
work_keys_str_mv AT amblerkate spousalconcordanceinjointandseparatehouseholdssurveyevidencefromnepal
AT dosscherylr spousalconcordanceinjointandseparatehouseholdssurveyevidencefromnepal
AT kierancaitlin spousalconcordanceinjointandseparatehouseholdssurveyevidencefromnepal
AT passarellisimone spousalconcordanceinjointandseparatehouseholdssurveyevidencefromnepal