Cooperation and the management of local common resources in remote rural communities: Evidence from Odisha, India

It is widely recognized that local management of common pool resources can be more efficient and more effective than private markets or top-down government management, especially in remote rural communities in which the institutions necessary for the enforcement of centrally-imposed regulations may...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ward, Patrick S., Alvi, Muzna, Makhija, Simrin, Spielman, David J.
Formato: Artículo preliminar
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Food Policy Research Institute 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143525
_version_ 1855534141221634048
author Ward, Patrick S.
Alvi, Muzna
Makhija, Simrin
Spielman, David J.
author_browse Alvi, Muzna
Makhija, Simrin
Spielman, David J.
Ward, Patrick S.
author_facet Ward, Patrick S.
Alvi, Muzna
Makhija, Simrin
Spielman, David J.
author_sort Ward, Patrick S.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description It is widely recognized that local management of common pool resources can be more efficient and more effective than private markets or top-down government management, especially in remote rural communities in which the institutions necessary for the enforcement of centrally-imposed regulations may be weak or prone to elite capture. In this paper, we explore the propensity for cooperation in the management of local common resources by introducing a variant of a public goods game among remote rural communities in the state of Odisha, in eastern India. We explore various patterns of cooperation, including free riding behavior, unconditional cooperation (altruism), and conditional cooperation, in which individuals' propensity toward cooperation is tied to their beliefs about the level of cooperation among their peers. We find that a significant portion of our sample fall into this latter category, but also that their expectations about the level of contributions among their peers is somewhat malleable, and beneficial activities from external actors such as NGOs can foster increased social cohesion which increases both the level of these expectations and the manner in which these expectations are translated into subsequent cooperative behavior. We also find that cooperation is somewhat fragile, with group heterogeneity and risk in the returns to cooperative behavior posing a threat to the stability of the cooperative system.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace143525
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1435252025-12-02T21:03:03Z Cooperation and the management of local common resources in remote rural communities: Evidence from Odisha, India Ward, Patrick S. Alvi, Muzna Makhija, Simrin Spielman, David J. public goods resources experimental devices capacity development non-governmental organizations risk rural areas cooperation governance It is widely recognized that local management of common pool resources can be more efficient and more effective than private markets or top-down government management, especially in remote rural communities in which the institutions necessary for the enforcement of centrally-imposed regulations may be weak or prone to elite capture. In this paper, we explore the propensity for cooperation in the management of local common resources by introducing a variant of a public goods game among remote rural communities in the state of Odisha, in eastern India. We explore various patterns of cooperation, including free riding behavior, unconditional cooperation (altruism), and conditional cooperation, in which individuals' propensity toward cooperation is tied to their beliefs about the level of cooperation among their peers. We find that a significant portion of our sample fall into this latter category, but also that their expectations about the level of contributions among their peers is somewhat malleable, and beneficial activities from external actors such as NGOs can foster increased social cohesion which increases both the level of these expectations and the manner in which these expectations are translated into subsequent cooperative behavior. We also find that cooperation is somewhat fragile, with group heterogeneity and risk in the returns to cooperative behavior posing a threat to the stability of the cooperative system. 2020-05-01 2024-05-22T12:14:51Z 2024-05-22T12:14:51Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143525 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Ward, Patrick S.; Alvi, Muzna Fatima; Makhija, Simrin; and Spielman, David J. 2020. Cooperation and the management of local common resources in remote rural communities: Evidence from Odisha, India. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1940. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133790.
spellingShingle public goods
resources
experimental devices
capacity development
non-governmental organizations
risk
rural areas
cooperation
governance
Ward, Patrick S.
Alvi, Muzna
Makhija, Simrin
Spielman, David J.
Cooperation and the management of local common resources in remote rural communities: Evidence from Odisha, India
title Cooperation and the management of local common resources in remote rural communities: Evidence from Odisha, India
title_full Cooperation and the management of local common resources in remote rural communities: Evidence from Odisha, India
title_fullStr Cooperation and the management of local common resources in remote rural communities: Evidence from Odisha, India
title_full_unstemmed Cooperation and the management of local common resources in remote rural communities: Evidence from Odisha, India
title_short Cooperation and the management of local common resources in remote rural communities: Evidence from Odisha, India
title_sort cooperation and the management of local common resources in remote rural communities evidence from odisha india
topic public goods
resources
experimental devices
capacity development
non-governmental organizations
risk
rural areas
cooperation
governance
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143525
work_keys_str_mv AT wardpatricks cooperationandthemanagementoflocalcommonresourcesinremoteruralcommunitiesevidencefromodishaindia
AT alvimuzna cooperationandthemanagementoflocalcommonresourcesinremoteruralcommunitiesevidencefromodishaindia
AT makhijasimrin cooperationandthemanagementoflocalcommonresourcesinremoteruralcommunitiesevidencefromodishaindia
AT spielmandavidj cooperationandthemanagementoflocalcommonresourcesinremoteruralcommunitiesevidencefromodishaindia