Using a list experiment to measure intimate partner violence: Cautionary evidence from Ethiopia

While indirect methods are increasingly widely used to measure sensitive behaviors such as intimate partner violence in order to minimize social desirability biases in responses, in developing countries the use of more complex indirect questioning methods raises important questions around how indivi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gilligan, Daniel O., Hidrobo, Melissa, Leight, Jessica, Tambet, Heleene
Format: Artículo preliminar
Language:Inglés
Published: International Food Policy Research Institute 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143417
_version_ 1855514838683353088
author Gilligan, Daniel O.
Hidrobo, Melissa
Leight, Jessica
Tambet, Heleene
author_browse Gilligan, Daniel O.
Hidrobo, Melissa
Leight, Jessica
Tambet, Heleene
author_facet Gilligan, Daniel O.
Hidrobo, Melissa
Leight, Jessica
Tambet, Heleene
author_sort Gilligan, Daniel O.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description While indirect methods are increasingly widely used to measure sensitive behaviors such as intimate partner violence in order to minimize social desirability biases in responses, in developing countries the use of more complex indirect questioning methods raises important questions around how individuals will react to the use of a more unusual and complex question structure. This paper presents evidence from a list experiment measuring multiple forms of intimate partner violence within an extremely poor sample of women in rural Ethiopia. We find that the list experiment does not generate estimates of intimate partner violence that are higher than direct response questions; rather, prevalence estimates using the list experiment are lower vis-à-vis prevalence estimates using the direct reports, and sometimes even negative. We interpret this finding as consistent with “fleeing” behavior by respondents who do not wish to be associated with statements associated with intimate partner violence.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace143417
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1434172025-12-02T21:03:03Z Using a list experiment to measure intimate partner violence: Cautionary evidence from Ethiopia Gilligan, Daniel O. Hidrobo, Melissa Leight, Jessica Tambet, Heleene rural communities gender capacity development measurement domestic violence While indirect methods are increasingly widely used to measure sensitive behaviors such as intimate partner violence in order to minimize social desirability biases in responses, in developing countries the use of more complex indirect questioning methods raises important questions around how individuals will react to the use of a more unusual and complex question structure. This paper presents evidence from a list experiment measuring multiple forms of intimate partner violence within an extremely poor sample of women in rural Ethiopia. We find that the list experiment does not generate estimates of intimate partner violence that are higher than direct response questions; rather, prevalence estimates using the list experiment are lower vis-à-vis prevalence estimates using the direct reports, and sometimes even negative. We interpret this finding as consistent with “fleeing” behavior by respondents who do not wish to be associated with statements associated with intimate partner violence. 2021-12-31 2024-05-22T12:14:00Z 2024-05-22T12:14:00Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143417 en https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134858 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143737 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147203 https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133748 Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Gilligan, Daniel O.; Hidrobo, Melissa; Leight, Jessica; and Tambet, Heleene. 2021. Using a list experiment to measure intimate partner violence: Cautionary evidence from Ethiopia. IFPRI Discussion Paper 2094. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134961.
spellingShingle rural communities
gender
capacity development
measurement
domestic violence
Gilligan, Daniel O.
Hidrobo, Melissa
Leight, Jessica
Tambet, Heleene
Using a list experiment to measure intimate partner violence: Cautionary evidence from Ethiopia
title Using a list experiment to measure intimate partner violence: Cautionary evidence from Ethiopia
title_full Using a list experiment to measure intimate partner violence: Cautionary evidence from Ethiopia
title_fullStr Using a list experiment to measure intimate partner violence: Cautionary evidence from Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Using a list experiment to measure intimate partner violence: Cautionary evidence from Ethiopia
title_short Using a list experiment to measure intimate partner violence: Cautionary evidence from Ethiopia
title_sort using a list experiment to measure intimate partner violence cautionary evidence from ethiopia
topic rural communities
gender
capacity development
measurement
domestic violence
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143417
work_keys_str_mv AT gilligandanielo usingalistexperimenttomeasureintimatepartnerviolencecautionaryevidencefromethiopia
AT hidrobomelissa usingalistexperimenttomeasureintimatepartnerviolencecautionaryevidencefromethiopia
AT leightjessica usingalistexperimenttomeasureintimatepartnerviolencecautionaryevidencefromethiopia
AT tambetheleene usingalistexperimenttomeasureintimatepartnerviolencecautionaryevidencefromethiopia