Impacts of agricultural investments on growth and poverty: A review of literature
Agricultural development is crucial in developing countries, and particularly in the poorest countries where it accounts for large shares of employment and income and whose poverty is due simply to having a large share of the workforce in low-productivity agriculture. Raising productivity in agricul...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Artículo preliminar |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143363 |
| _version_ | 1855519936787513344 |
|---|---|
| author | Martin, Will |
| author_browse | Martin, Will |
| author_facet | Martin, Will |
| author_sort | Martin, Will |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | Agricultural development is crucial in developing countries, and particularly in the poorest countries where it accounts for large shares of employment and income and whose poverty is due simply to having a large share of the workforce in low-productivity agriculture. Raising productivity in agriculture is critically important for development, as is smoothly moving workers out of agriculture into more productive employment in other sectors. Raising agricultural productivity helps both to raise incomes and to reduce poverty-both by raising the incomes of poor people working in agriculture and by lowering the prices of foods that make up a disproportionately large share of the expenditures of poor people. In small and open economies, the in-crease in profitability of agriculture following improvements in productivity might tend to retain or even attract workers into agriculture. By contrast, at a global level, or at national level when focusses on self-sufficiency, improvements in agricultural productivity will free up labor for employment in other sectors. Incomes are generally much higher in non-agricultural work in developing countries-more than double those in agriculture after careful adjustment for key differences. This raises the possibility of a double dividend from structural transformation as workers move into higher-productivity activities. A key question for development is whether it is enough to simply evaluate the gains from higher productivity within agriculture, or whether potential benefits from structural change be included as well. This paper examines the arguments on this question. It concludes that these dividends may be substantial-but whether they are or not depends on the source of the initial differences in productivity and on the direction of movement when agricultural productivity rises. If it results from barriers such as restrictions on the transfer of farmland or requirements for residence permits in urban areas, there are likely to be substantial welfare gains when labor moves out of agriculture. They may also be substantial if urban wages are artificially high and attract substantial numbers of job-waiters into unemployment. However, these gains may be illusory if the income gaps arise primarily from differences in skills or from reluctance to move created by asset fixity. |
| format | Artículo preliminar |
| id | CGSpace143363 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateRange | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| publisherStr | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1433632025-11-06T05:42:43Z Impacts of agricultural investments on growth and poverty: A review of literature Martin, Will income models economic growth investment agriculture agricultural productivity poverty Agricultural development is crucial in developing countries, and particularly in the poorest countries where it accounts for large shares of employment and income and whose poverty is due simply to having a large share of the workforce in low-productivity agriculture. Raising productivity in agriculture is critically important for development, as is smoothly moving workers out of agriculture into more productive employment in other sectors. Raising agricultural productivity helps both to raise incomes and to reduce poverty-both by raising the incomes of poor people working in agriculture and by lowering the prices of foods that make up a disproportionately large share of the expenditures of poor people. In small and open economies, the in-crease in profitability of agriculture following improvements in productivity might tend to retain or even attract workers into agriculture. By contrast, at a global level, or at national level when focusses on self-sufficiency, improvements in agricultural productivity will free up labor for employment in other sectors. Incomes are generally much higher in non-agricultural work in developing countries-more than double those in agriculture after careful adjustment for key differences. This raises the possibility of a double dividend from structural transformation as workers move into higher-productivity activities. A key question for development is whether it is enough to simply evaluate the gains from higher productivity within agriculture, or whether potential benefits from structural change be included as well. This paper examines the arguments on this question. It concludes that these dividends may be substantial-but whether they are or not depends on the source of the initial differences in productivity and on the direction of movement when agricultural productivity rises. If it results from barriers such as restrictions on the transfer of farmland or requirements for residence permits in urban areas, there are likely to be substantial welfare gains when labor moves out of agriculture. They may also be substantial if urban wages are artificially high and attract substantial numbers of job-waiters into unemployment. However, these gains may be illusory if the income gaps arise primarily from differences in skills or from reluctance to move created by asset fixity. 2021-11-01 2024-05-22T12:13:37Z 2024-05-22T12:13:37Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143363 en Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Millennium Challenge Corporation Martin, Will. 2021. Impacts of agricultural investments on growth and poverty: A review of literature. IFPRI – MCC Technical Paper Series: Prioritizing Agricultural Investments for Income, Poverty Reduction, and Nutrition 1. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); and Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134778. |
| spellingShingle | income models economic growth investment agriculture agricultural productivity poverty Martin, Will Impacts of agricultural investments on growth and poverty: A review of literature |
| title | Impacts of agricultural investments on growth and poverty: A review of literature |
| title_full | Impacts of agricultural investments on growth and poverty: A review of literature |
| title_fullStr | Impacts of agricultural investments on growth and poverty: A review of literature |
| title_full_unstemmed | Impacts of agricultural investments on growth and poverty: A review of literature |
| title_short | Impacts of agricultural investments on growth and poverty: A review of literature |
| title_sort | impacts of agricultural investments on growth and poverty a review of literature |
| topic | income models economic growth investment agriculture agricultural productivity poverty |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143363 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT martinwill impactsofagriculturalinvestmentsongrowthandpovertyareviewofliterature |