Fertilizer quality assessment: Perception versus testing in selected Ghanaian districts

Fertilizer use in Sub-Saharan Africa remains below recommended rates, contributing to low yields, and increasing poverty. Poor quality fertilizer – whether perceived or real – is often cited as a reason for low adoption rates. In Ghana, for example, there are widespread but often unsubstantiated cla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Asante, Seth, Simons, Andrew M., Andam, Kwaw S., Amprofi, Felicia Ansah, Osei-Assibey, Ernest, Iddrisu, Adisatu
Format: Artículo preliminar
Language:Inglés
Published: International Food Policy Research Institute 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143345
_version_ 1855521925550309376
author Asante, Seth
Simons, Andrew M.
Andam, Kwaw S.
Amprofi, Felicia Ansah
Osei-Assibey, Ernest
Iddrisu, Adisatu
author_browse Amprofi, Felicia Ansah
Andam, Kwaw S.
Asante, Seth
Iddrisu, Adisatu
Osei-Assibey, Ernest
Simons, Andrew M.
author_facet Asante, Seth
Simons, Andrew M.
Andam, Kwaw S.
Amprofi, Felicia Ansah
Osei-Assibey, Ernest
Iddrisu, Adisatu
author_sort Asante, Seth
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Fertilizer use in Sub-Saharan Africa remains below recommended rates, contributing to low yields, and increasing poverty. Poor quality fertilizer – whether perceived or real – is often cited as a reason for low adoption rates. In Ghana, for example, there are widespread but often unsubstantiated claims of substandard fertilizers. This is a concern for farmers with limited purchasing power and without the means to independently substantiate the quality of agricultural inputs. This paper describes the agricultural input sector in Ghana, compares farmers’ perception of fertilizer quality with those of input dealers, and analyses chemical tests of fertilizers performed in a laboratory. The fertilizers were sampled from selected districts participating in the Planting for Food and Jobs initiative, a large-scale farm input subsidy program. We find that input dealers and farmers are somewhat suspicious of the quality of commercially supplied and government subsidized fertilizers. However, the true quality measures based on laboratory testing of fertilizers sold in agricultural input shops were found to largely meet the labeled chemical composition.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace143345
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1433452025-11-06T05:53:06Z Fertilizer quality assessment: Perception versus testing in selected Ghanaian districts Asante, Seth Simons, Andrew M. Andam, Kwaw S. Amprofi, Felicia Ansah Osei-Assibey, Ernest Iddrisu, Adisatu fertilizers agricultural production surveys capacity development quality farm inputs subsidies farmers' attitudes Fertilizer use in Sub-Saharan Africa remains below recommended rates, contributing to low yields, and increasing poverty. Poor quality fertilizer – whether perceived or real – is often cited as a reason for low adoption rates. In Ghana, for example, there are widespread but often unsubstantiated claims of substandard fertilizers. This is a concern for farmers with limited purchasing power and without the means to independently substantiate the quality of agricultural inputs. This paper describes the agricultural input sector in Ghana, compares farmers’ perception of fertilizer quality with those of input dealers, and analyses chemical tests of fertilizers performed in a laboratory. The fertilizers were sampled from selected districts participating in the Planting for Food and Jobs initiative, a large-scale farm input subsidy program. We find that input dealers and farmers are somewhat suspicious of the quality of commercially supplied and government subsidized fertilizers. However, the true quality measures based on laboratory testing of fertilizers sold in agricultural input shops were found to largely meet the labeled chemical composition. 2021-12-22 2024-05-22T12:13:32Z 2024-05-22T12:13:32Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143345 en https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134353 https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134458 https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134432 https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134481 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01287-8 Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Asante, Seth; Simons, Andrew M.; Andam, Kwaw S.; Amprofi, Felicia Ansah; Osei-Assibey, Ernest; and Iddrisu, Adisatu. 2021. Fertilizer quality assessment: Perception versus testing in selected Ghanaian districts. GSSP Working Paper 61. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134895.
spellingShingle fertilizers
agricultural production
surveys
capacity development
quality
farm inputs
subsidies
farmers' attitudes
Asante, Seth
Simons, Andrew M.
Andam, Kwaw S.
Amprofi, Felicia Ansah
Osei-Assibey, Ernest
Iddrisu, Adisatu
Fertilizer quality assessment: Perception versus testing in selected Ghanaian districts
title Fertilizer quality assessment: Perception versus testing in selected Ghanaian districts
title_full Fertilizer quality assessment: Perception versus testing in selected Ghanaian districts
title_fullStr Fertilizer quality assessment: Perception versus testing in selected Ghanaian districts
title_full_unstemmed Fertilizer quality assessment: Perception versus testing in selected Ghanaian districts
title_short Fertilizer quality assessment: Perception versus testing in selected Ghanaian districts
title_sort fertilizer quality assessment perception versus testing in selected ghanaian districts
topic fertilizers
agricultural production
surveys
capacity development
quality
farm inputs
subsidies
farmers' attitudes
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143345
work_keys_str_mv AT asanteseth fertilizerqualityassessmentperceptionversustestinginselectedghanaiandistricts
AT simonsandrewm fertilizerqualityassessmentperceptionversustestinginselectedghanaiandistricts
AT andamkwaws fertilizerqualityassessmentperceptionversustestinginselectedghanaiandistricts
AT amprofifeliciaansah fertilizerqualityassessmentperceptionversustestinginselectedghanaiandistricts
AT oseiassibeyernest fertilizerqualityassessmentperceptionversustestinginselectedghanaiandistricts
AT iddrisuadisatu fertilizerqualityassessmentperceptionversustestinginselectedghanaiandistricts