Heterogeneous effects of marketing contracts and resource-providing contracts on household income

In the existing literature, the effects of contract farming on household welfare were examined with mixed results. Most studies looked at single contract types. This paper contributes to the literature by comparing two types of contracts – simple marketing contracts and resource providing contracts...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruml, Anette, Ragasa, Catherine, Qaim, Matin
Formato: Artículo preliminar
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Universität Göttingen 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143340
_version_ 1855539494831259648
author Ruml, Anette
Ragasa, Catherine
Qaim, Matin
author_browse Qaim, Matin
Ragasa, Catherine
Ruml, Anette
author_facet Ruml, Anette
Ragasa, Catherine
Qaim, Matin
author_sort Ruml, Anette
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description In the existing literature, the effects of contract farming on household welfare were examined with mixed results. Most studies looked at single contract types. This paper contributes to the literature by comparing two types of contracts – simple marketing contracts and resource providing contracts – in the Ghanaian oil palm sector. We investigate the effects of both contracts on farm income, as well as spillovers on other household income sources. We use survey data collected with an innovative sampling design and a control function approach to address possible issues of endogeneity. Both contracts lead to large positive effects on total household income in a similar magnitude, yet through quite different mechanisms. Farmers under the marketing contract use the increase in oil palm profits to transition out of agricultural production and into off-farm employment. Farmers under the resource-providing contract have a stronger dependency on income from oil palm, which is considerably more profitable under the contract. The findings underline that contract characteristics matter for the effects and that disaggregated analysis of different income sources is important to understand the underlying mechanisms.
format Artículo preliminar
id CGSpace143340
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Universität Göttingen
publisherStr Universität Göttingen
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1433402025-02-24T06:49:27Z Heterogeneous effects of marketing contracts and resource-providing contracts on household income Ruml, Anette Ragasa, Catherine Qaim, Matin income palm oil industries resources households contracts capacity development farm income household income marketing smallholders palm oils contract farming control function approach credit In the existing literature, the effects of contract farming on household welfare were examined with mixed results. Most studies looked at single contract types. This paper contributes to the literature by comparing two types of contracts – simple marketing contracts and resource providing contracts – in the Ghanaian oil palm sector. We investigate the effects of both contracts on farm income, as well as spillovers on other household income sources. We use survey data collected with an innovative sampling design and a control function approach to address possible issues of endogeneity. Both contracts lead to large positive effects on total household income in a similar magnitude, yet through quite different mechanisms. Farmers under the marketing contract use the increase in oil palm profits to transition out of agricultural production and into off-farm employment. Farmers under the resource-providing contract have a stronger dependency on income from oil palm, which is considerably more profitable under the contract. The findings underline that contract characteristics matter for the effects and that disaggregated analysis of different income sources is important to understand the underlying mechanisms. 2020-03-01 2024-05-22T12:13:30Z 2024-05-22T12:13:30Z Working Paper https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143340 en https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.09.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.11.001 Open Access Universität Göttingen Ruml, Anette; Ragasa, Catherine; and Qaim, Matin. 2020. Heterogeneous effects of marketing contracts and resource-providing contracts on household income. GlobalFood Discussion Papers 138. https://purl.umn.edu/301005
spellingShingle income
palm oil industries
resources
households
contracts
capacity development
farm income
household income
marketing
smallholders
palm oils
contract farming
control function approach
credit
Ruml, Anette
Ragasa, Catherine
Qaim, Matin
Heterogeneous effects of marketing contracts and resource-providing contracts on household income
title Heterogeneous effects of marketing contracts and resource-providing contracts on household income
title_full Heterogeneous effects of marketing contracts and resource-providing contracts on household income
title_fullStr Heterogeneous effects of marketing contracts and resource-providing contracts on household income
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneous effects of marketing contracts and resource-providing contracts on household income
title_short Heterogeneous effects of marketing contracts and resource-providing contracts on household income
title_sort heterogeneous effects of marketing contracts and resource providing contracts on household income
topic income
palm oil industries
resources
households
contracts
capacity development
farm income
household income
marketing
smallholders
palm oils
contract farming
control function approach
credit
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/143340
work_keys_str_mv AT rumlanette heterogeneouseffectsofmarketingcontractsandresourceprovidingcontractsonhouseholdincome
AT ragasacatherine heterogeneouseffectsofmarketingcontractsandresourceprovidingcontractsonhouseholdincome
AT qaimmatin heterogeneouseffectsofmarketingcontractsandresourceprovidingcontractsonhouseholdincome