Beneficiary views on cash and in-kind payments: Evidence from Ethiopia's Productive Safety Net Programme
Economists often default to the assumption that cash is always preferable to an in-kind transfer. Do beneficiaries feel the same way? This paper addresses this issue using longitudinal household data from Ethiopia, where a large-scale social safety net intervention (PSNP) operates. Even though most...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
World Bank
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142931 |
Similar Items: Beneficiary views on cash and in-kind payments: Evidence from Ethiopia's Productive Safety Net Programme
- Beneficiary views on cash and in-kind payments: Evidence from Ethiopia’s productive safety net programme
- Payment modality preferences: Evidence from Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Programme
- How programme design and local context shape the lasting effects of cash and food transfers
- In the form of bread: A randomized comparison of cash and food transfers in Yemen
- The impact of cash and food transfers: Evidence from a randomized intervention in Niger
- Much ado about modalities: Multicountry experiments on the effects of cash and food transfers on consumption patterns