The rapid-but from a low base-uptake of agricultural mechanization in Ethiopia: Patterns, implications, and challenges
The uptake of agricultural mechanization in Ethiopia is low, with less than 1 percent of agricultural plots plowed with a tractor. However, in recent years the uptake of agricultural machinery has accelerated. We note an impressive increase in imports of combine harvesters and of tractors, seemingly...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book Chapter |
| Language: | Inglés |
| Published: |
International Food Policy Research Institute
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142846 |
| _version_ | 1855537079458463744 |
|---|---|
| author | Berhane, Guush Dereje, Mekdim Minten, Bart Tamru, Seneshaw |
| author_browse | Berhane, Guush Dereje, Mekdim Minten, Bart Tamru, Seneshaw |
| author_facet | Berhane, Guush Dereje, Mekdim Minten, Bart Tamru, Seneshaw |
| author_sort | Berhane, Guush |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | The uptake of agricultural mechanization in Ethiopia is low, with less than 1 percent of agricultural plots plowed with a tractor. However, in recent years the uptake of agricultural machinery has accelerated. We note an impressive increase in imports of combine harvesters and of tractors, seemingly associated with the increasing costs of agricultural labor and animal traction, for which agricultural mechanization can substitute. We estimate that a quarter of the area in Ethiopia planted with wheat—the fourth most important cereal in the country—is currently harvested by combine harvesters, and they are widely used in the major wheat-growing zones in the southeast of the country in particular. Private mechanization service providers have rapidly emerged. Smallholders in these wheat-growing zones rely heavily on agricultural machinery rental services for plowing, harrowing, and harvesting. We find that mechanization is associated with significantly lower labor use, and that the adoption of combine harvesters—but not tractors—is significantly associated with higher yields, seemingly due to lower postharvest losses. Although further expansion of mechanization in the country is desired given the environmental and financial costs of holding oxen, and the higher yields linked with some forms of mechanization, it appears to be hampered by farm structures, particularly small farm sizes and consequent limits in scale; fragmented plots; crop diversity; physical constraints, such as the presence of stones, steep fields, and certain soil types; and economic and financial constraints, including limited access to foreign exchange and credit, and the still relatively low wages in less commercialized zones. |
| format | Book Chapter |
| id | CGSpace142846 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateRange | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| publisherStr | International Food Policy Research Institute |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1428462025-11-06T04:14:44Z The rapid-but from a low base-uptake of agricultural mechanization in Ethiopia: Patterns, implications, and challenges Berhane, Guush Dereje, Mekdim Minten, Bart Tamru, Seneshaw tractors imports policies surveys equipment technology farmers households demand labour agriculture harvesters harvesting agricultural mechanization mechanization remuneration rural areas farm size governance The uptake of agricultural mechanization in Ethiopia is low, with less than 1 percent of agricultural plots plowed with a tractor. However, in recent years the uptake of agricultural machinery has accelerated. We note an impressive increase in imports of combine harvesters and of tractors, seemingly associated with the increasing costs of agricultural labor and animal traction, for which agricultural mechanization can substitute. We estimate that a quarter of the area in Ethiopia planted with wheat—the fourth most important cereal in the country—is currently harvested by combine harvesters, and they are widely used in the major wheat-growing zones in the southeast of the country in particular. Private mechanization service providers have rapidly emerged. Smallholders in these wheat-growing zones rely heavily on agricultural machinery rental services for plowing, harrowing, and harvesting. We find that mechanization is associated with significantly lower labor use, and that the adoption of combine harvesters—but not tractors—is significantly associated with higher yields, seemingly due to lower postharvest losses. Although further expansion of mechanization in the country is desired given the environmental and financial costs of holding oxen, and the higher yields linked with some forms of mechanization, it appears to be hampered by farm structures, particularly small farm sizes and consequent limits in scale; fragmented plots; crop diversity; physical constraints, such as the presence of stones, steep fields, and certain soil types; and economic and financial constraints, including limited access to foreign exchange and credit, and the still relatively low wages in less commercialized zones. 2020-11-01 2024-05-22T12:11:10Z 2024-05-22T12:11:10Z Book Chapter https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142846 en https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896293809 https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896293823 Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Berhane, Guush; Dereje, Mekdim; Minten, Bart; and Tamru, Seneshaw. 2020. The rapid-but from a low base-uptake of agricultural mechanization in Ethiopia: Patterns, implications, and challenges. In An evolving paradigm of agricultural mechanization development: How much can Africa learn from Asia?, eds. Xinshen Diao, Hiroyuki Takeshima, and Xiaobo Zhang. Part Four: African Countries, Chapter 10, Pp. 329-375. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896293809_10. |
| spellingShingle | tractors imports policies surveys equipment technology farmers households demand labour agriculture harvesters harvesting agricultural mechanization mechanization remuneration rural areas farm size governance Berhane, Guush Dereje, Mekdim Minten, Bart Tamru, Seneshaw The rapid-but from a low base-uptake of agricultural mechanization in Ethiopia: Patterns, implications, and challenges |
| title | The rapid-but from a low base-uptake of agricultural mechanization in Ethiopia: Patterns, implications, and challenges |
| title_full | The rapid-but from a low base-uptake of agricultural mechanization in Ethiopia: Patterns, implications, and challenges |
| title_fullStr | The rapid-but from a low base-uptake of agricultural mechanization in Ethiopia: Patterns, implications, and challenges |
| title_full_unstemmed | The rapid-but from a low base-uptake of agricultural mechanization in Ethiopia: Patterns, implications, and challenges |
| title_short | The rapid-but from a low base-uptake of agricultural mechanization in Ethiopia: Patterns, implications, and challenges |
| title_sort | rapid but from a low base uptake of agricultural mechanization in ethiopia patterns implications and challenges |
| topic | tractors imports policies surveys equipment technology farmers households demand labour agriculture harvesters harvesting agricultural mechanization mechanization remuneration rural areas farm size governance |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142846 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT berhaneguush therapidbutfromalowbaseuptakeofagriculturalmechanizationinethiopiapatternsimplicationsandchallenges AT derejemekdim therapidbutfromalowbaseuptakeofagriculturalmechanizationinethiopiapatternsimplicationsandchallenges AT mintenbart therapidbutfromalowbaseuptakeofagriculturalmechanizationinethiopiapatternsimplicationsandchallenges AT tamruseneshaw therapidbutfromalowbaseuptakeofagriculturalmechanizationinethiopiapatternsimplicationsandchallenges AT berhaneguush rapidbutfromalowbaseuptakeofagriculturalmechanizationinethiopiapatternsimplicationsandchallenges AT derejemekdim rapidbutfromalowbaseuptakeofagriculturalmechanizationinethiopiapatternsimplicationsandchallenges AT mintenbart rapidbutfromalowbaseuptakeofagriculturalmechanizationinethiopiapatternsimplicationsandchallenges AT tamruseneshaw rapidbutfromalowbaseuptakeofagriculturalmechanizationinethiopiapatternsimplicationsandchallenges |