Do remote areas benefit from economic growth? Evidence from Uganda
One of the most universal patterns in the spatial distribution of poverty in developing countries is that the incidence of poverty is lower in urban areas than in rural areas. It is widely accepted, though less well documented, that remote rural areas tend to be poorer than areas with good market ac...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142727 |
Ejemplares similares: Do remote areas benefit from economic growth? Evidence from Uganda
- Is poverty reduction over-stated in Uganda?: Evidence from alternative poverty measures
- Are poor, remote areas left behind in agricultural development: The case of Tanzania
- Are poor, remote areas left behind in agricultural development: the case of Tanzania
- Nonlinear dynamics of livestock assets: Evidence from Ethiopia
- Remittances, Investment, and Rural Asset Accumulation in Pakistan
- Measuring the impact of asset complementarities: the case of rural Peru