Smart subsidies for sustainable soils: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in southern Malawi

Conventional agricultural practices – especially conventional tillage – are a major driver of soil erosion globally. While soil may not frequently considered a vulnerable natural resource, the erosion and degradation of soils poses a serious threat to food production and the production of numerous o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ward, Patrick S., Mapemba, Lawrence, Bell, Andrew R.
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142706
_version_ 1855532649301409792
author Ward, Patrick S.
Mapemba, Lawrence
Bell, Andrew R.
author_browse Bell, Andrew R.
Mapemba, Lawrence
Ward, Patrick S.
author_facet Ward, Patrick S.
Mapemba, Lawrence
Bell, Andrew R.
author_sort Ward, Patrick S.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Conventional agricultural practices – especially conventional tillage – are a major driver of soil erosion globally. While soil may not frequently considered a vulnerable natural resource, the erosion and degradation of soils poses a serious threat to food production and the production of numerous otherin situ andex situ ecosystem services. This study provides some of the first evidence on the effectiveness of a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program to encourage the adoption of soil conservation practices, specifically conservation agriculture (CA). Through minimized soil disturbance, permanent soil cover, and diversified crop mix, CA is believed to enhance soil fertility and rehabilitate soil structure, with the resulting preservation of ecosystem service flows. By providing calibrated financial incentives, we demonstrate that it is possible to substantially increase the extent and intensity of CA adoption. What’s more, we show that a novel incentive mechanisms that leverages social networks for the consolidation of fragmented land may be more effective at bringing more land under conservation objectives, even if some of the additional land does not officially fall under the purview of the PES program. We also demonstrate that some of the supposed weaknesses hindering the adoption of CA – lower yields in the short-run and higher expenditures on weed control – were not necessarily obstacles in our study area, perhaps suggesting that the provision of subsidies need not continue into perpetuity, but may only be needed to overcome short-term transition costs.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace142706
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1427062025-12-08T10:11:39Z Smart subsidies for sustainable soils: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in southern Malawi Ward, Patrick S. Mapemba, Lawrence Bell, Andrew R. soil randomized controlled trials sustainability conservation agriculture subsidies erosion ecosystem services Conventional agricultural practices – especially conventional tillage – are a major driver of soil erosion globally. While soil may not frequently considered a vulnerable natural resource, the erosion and degradation of soils poses a serious threat to food production and the production of numerous otherin situ andex situ ecosystem services. This study provides some of the first evidence on the effectiveness of a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program to encourage the adoption of soil conservation practices, specifically conservation agriculture (CA). Through minimized soil disturbance, permanent soil cover, and diversified crop mix, CA is believed to enhance soil fertility and rehabilitate soil structure, with the resulting preservation of ecosystem service flows. By providing calibrated financial incentives, we demonstrate that it is possible to substantially increase the extent and intensity of CA adoption. What’s more, we show that a novel incentive mechanisms that leverages social networks for the consolidation of fragmented land may be more effective at bringing more land under conservation objectives, even if some of the additional land does not officially fall under the purview of the PES program. We also demonstrate that some of the supposed weaknesses hindering the adoption of CA – lower yields in the short-run and higher expenditures on weed control – were not necessarily obstacles in our study area, perhaps suggesting that the provision of subsidies need not continue into perpetuity, but may only be needed to overcome short-term transition costs. 2021-10-21 2024-05-22T12:10:54Z 2024-05-22T12:10:54Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142706 en https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010051 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.005 https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23912 Open Access Elsevier Ward, Patrick S.; Mapemba, Lawrence; and Bell, Andrew R. 2021. Smart subsidies for sustainable soils: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in southern Malawi. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 110(October 2021): 102556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102556
spellingShingle soil
randomized controlled trials
sustainability
conservation agriculture
subsidies
erosion
ecosystem services
Ward, Patrick S.
Mapemba, Lawrence
Bell, Andrew R.
Smart subsidies for sustainable soils: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in southern Malawi
title Smart subsidies for sustainable soils: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in southern Malawi
title_full Smart subsidies for sustainable soils: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in southern Malawi
title_fullStr Smart subsidies for sustainable soils: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in southern Malawi
title_full_unstemmed Smart subsidies for sustainable soils: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in southern Malawi
title_short Smart subsidies for sustainable soils: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in southern Malawi
title_sort smart subsidies for sustainable soils evidence from a randomized controlled trial in southern malawi
topic soil
randomized controlled trials
sustainability
conservation agriculture
subsidies
erosion
ecosystem services
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142706
work_keys_str_mv AT wardpatricks smartsubsidiesforsustainablesoilsevidencefromarandomizedcontrolledtrialinsouthernmalawi
AT mapembalawrence smartsubsidiesforsustainablesoilsevidencefromarandomizedcontrolledtrialinsouthernmalawi
AT bellandrewr smartsubsidiesforsustainablesoilsevidencefromarandomizedcontrolledtrialinsouthernmalawi