A comparison of the Indian diet with the EAT-Lancet reference diet
The 2019 EAT-Lancet Commission report recommends healthy diets that can feed 10 billion people by 2050 from environmentally sustainable food systems. This study compares food consumption patterns in India, from different income groups, regions and sectors (rural/urban), with the EAT-Lancet reference...
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142371 |
| _version_ | 1855527554422669312 |
|---|---|
| author | Sharma, Manika Kishore, Avinash Roy, Devesh Joshi, Kuhu |
| author_browse | Joshi, Kuhu Kishore, Avinash Roy, Devesh Sharma, Manika |
| author_facet | Sharma, Manika Kishore, Avinash Roy, Devesh Joshi, Kuhu |
| author_sort | Sharma, Manika |
| collection | Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace) |
| description | The 2019 EAT-Lancet Commission report recommends healthy diets that can feed 10 billion people by 2050 from environmentally sustainable food systems. This study compares food consumption patterns in India, from different income groups, regions and sectors (rural/urban), with the EAT-Lancet reference diet and highlights the deviations. The analysis was done using data from the Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) of a nationally representative sample of 0.102 million households from 7469 villages and 5268 urban blocks of India conducted by the National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) in 2011–12. This is the most recent nationally representative data on household consumption in India. Calorie consumption (kcal/capita/day) of each food group was calculated using the quantity of consumption from the data and nutritional values of food items provided by NSSO. Diets for rural and urban, poor and rich households across different regions were compared with EAT-Lancet reference diet. The average daily calorie consumption in India is below the recommended 2503 kcal/capita/day across all groups compared, except for the richest 5% of the population. Calorie share of whole grains is significantly higher than the EAT-Lancet recommendations while those of fruits, vegetables, legumes, meat, fish and eggs are significantly lower. The share of calories from protein sources is only 6–8% in India compared to 29% in the reference diet. The imbalance is highest for the households in the lowest decile of consumption expenditure, but even the richest households in India do not consume adequate amounts of fruits, vegetables and non-cereal proteins in their diets. An average Indian household consumes more calories from processed foods than fruits. Indian diets, across states and income groups, are unhealthy. Indians also consume excess amounts of cereals and not enough proteins, fruits, and vegetables. Importantly, unlike many countries, excess consumption of animal protein is not a problem in India. Indian policymakers need to accelerate food-system-wide efforts to make healthier and sustainable diets more affordable, accessible and acceptable. |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | CGSpace142371 |
| institution | CGIAR Consortium |
| language | Inglés |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateRange | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | BioMed Central |
| publisherStr | BioMed Central |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | CGSpace1423712025-03-11T12:14:31Z A comparison of the Indian diet with the EAT-Lancet reference diet Sharma, Manika Kishore, Avinash Roy, Devesh Joshi, Kuhu health foods dietary guidelines surveys calories processed foods nutrition proteins food consumption diet food systems The 2019 EAT-Lancet Commission report recommends healthy diets that can feed 10 billion people by 2050 from environmentally sustainable food systems. This study compares food consumption patterns in India, from different income groups, regions and sectors (rural/urban), with the EAT-Lancet reference diet and highlights the deviations. The analysis was done using data from the Consumption Expenditure Survey (CES) of a nationally representative sample of 0.102 million households from 7469 villages and 5268 urban blocks of India conducted by the National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) in 2011–12. This is the most recent nationally representative data on household consumption in India. Calorie consumption (kcal/capita/day) of each food group was calculated using the quantity of consumption from the data and nutritional values of food items provided by NSSO. Diets for rural and urban, poor and rich households across different regions were compared with EAT-Lancet reference diet. The average daily calorie consumption in India is below the recommended 2503 kcal/capita/day across all groups compared, except for the richest 5% of the population. Calorie share of whole grains is significantly higher than the EAT-Lancet recommendations while those of fruits, vegetables, legumes, meat, fish and eggs are significantly lower. The share of calories from protein sources is only 6–8% in India compared to 29% in the reference diet. The imbalance is highest for the households in the lowest decile of consumption expenditure, but even the richest households in India do not consume adequate amounts of fruits, vegetables and non-cereal proteins in their diets. An average Indian household consumes more calories from processed foods than fruits. Indian diets, across states and income groups, are unhealthy. Indians also consume excess amounts of cereals and not enough proteins, fruits, and vegetables. Importantly, unlike many countries, excess consumption of animal protein is not a problem in India. Indian policymakers need to accelerate food-system-wide efforts to make healthier and sustainable diets more affordable, accessible and acceptable. 2020-06-01 2024-05-22T12:10:23Z 2024-05-22T12:10:23Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142371 en Open Access BioMed Central Sharma, Manika; Kishore, Avinash; Roy, Devesh; and Joshi, Kuhu. 2020. A comparison of the Indian diet with the EAT-Lancet reference diet. BMC Public Health 20: 812. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08951-8 |
| spellingShingle | health foods dietary guidelines surveys calories processed foods nutrition proteins food consumption diet food systems Sharma, Manika Kishore, Avinash Roy, Devesh Joshi, Kuhu A comparison of the Indian diet with the EAT-Lancet reference diet |
| title | A comparison of the Indian diet with the EAT-Lancet reference diet |
| title_full | A comparison of the Indian diet with the EAT-Lancet reference diet |
| title_fullStr | A comparison of the Indian diet with the EAT-Lancet reference diet |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of the Indian diet with the EAT-Lancet reference diet |
| title_short | A comparison of the Indian diet with the EAT-Lancet reference diet |
| title_sort | comparison of the indian diet with the eat lancet reference diet |
| topic | health foods dietary guidelines surveys calories processed foods nutrition proteins food consumption diet food systems |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142371 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmamanika acomparisonoftheindiandietwiththeeatlancetreferencediet AT kishoreavinash acomparisonoftheindiandietwiththeeatlancetreferencediet AT roydevesh acomparisonoftheindiandietwiththeeatlancetreferencediet AT joshikuhu acomparisonoftheindiandietwiththeeatlancetreferencediet AT sharmamanika comparisonoftheindiandietwiththeeatlancetreferencediet AT kishoreavinash comparisonoftheindiandietwiththeeatlancetreferencediet AT roydevesh comparisonoftheindiandietwiththeeatlancetreferencediet AT joshikuhu comparisonoftheindiandietwiththeeatlancetreferencediet |