Beneficiary views on cash and in-kind payments: Evidence from Ethiopia’s productive safety net programme
Economists often default to the assumption that cash is always preferable to an in-kind transfer. Do beneficiaries feel the same way? This paper addresses this issue using longitudinal household data from Ethiopia where a large-scale social safety net intervention (PSNP) operates. Even though most p...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo preliminar |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
World Bank
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142253 |
Ejemplares similares: Beneficiary views on cash and in-kind payments: Evidence from Ethiopia’s productive safety net programme
- Beneficiary views on cash and in-kind payments: Evidence from Ethiopia's Productive Safety Net Programme
- Payment modality preferences: Evidence from Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Programme
- How programme design and local context shape the lasting effects of cash and food transfers
- An evaluation of the impact of PROGRESA cash payments on private inter-household transfers: final report
- Targeting food security interventions when “everyone is poor”: The case of Ethiopia's Productive Safety Net Programme
- Money for nothing