The CAADP 2020 biennial review: Why many countries are off-track

This note analyzes the trajectory of the benchmark and its implications for the effort required of countries to remain on-track or get on-track toward achieving the goals and targets of the Malabo Declaration by 2025. It also analyzes the change in the overall score obtained by different countries b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Benin, Samuel
Formato: Brief
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: International Food Policy Research Institute 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142079
_version_ 1855536946101616640
author Benin, Samuel
author_browse Benin, Samuel
author_facet Benin, Samuel
author_sort Benin, Samuel
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description This note analyzes the trajectory of the benchmark and its implications for the effort required of countries to remain on-track or get on-track toward achieving the goals and targets of the Malabo Declaration by 2025. It also analyzes the change in the overall score obtained by different countries between the 2018 and 2020 BRs by decomposing the contribution of different indictors to the change. This helps to explain why fewer countries were on-track in the 2020 BR compared to the 2018 BR. The note concludes with a look at the potential challenges countries may face, most notably those brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, and prospects for them to remain or get on-track in future BRs.
format Brief
id CGSpace142079
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher International Food Policy Research Institute
publisherStr International Food Policy Research Institute
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1420792025-11-06T07:23:31Z The CAADP 2020 biennial review: Why many countries are off-track Benin, Samuel agricultural sector covid-19 indicators caadp agriculture benchmarks This note analyzes the trajectory of the benchmark and its implications for the effort required of countries to remain on-track or get on-track toward achieving the goals and targets of the Malabo Declaration by 2025. It also analyzes the change in the overall score obtained by different countries between the 2018 and 2020 BRs by decomposing the contribution of different indictors to the change. This helps to explain why fewer countries were on-track in the 2020 BR compared to the 2018 BR. The note concludes with a look at the potential challenges countries may face, most notably those brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, and prospects for them to remain or get on-track in future BRs. 2020-03-01 2024-05-22T12:09:55Z 2024-05-22T12:09:55Z Brief https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142079 en https://hdl.handle.net/10568/145867 https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134837 Open Access application/pdf International Food Policy Research Institute Benin, Samuel. 2020. The CAADP 2020 biennial review: Why many countries are off-track. ReSAKSS Issue Note 32. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133721.
spellingShingle agricultural sector
covid-19
indicators
caadp
agriculture
benchmarks
Benin, Samuel
The CAADP 2020 biennial review: Why many countries are off-track
title The CAADP 2020 biennial review: Why many countries are off-track
title_full The CAADP 2020 biennial review: Why many countries are off-track
title_fullStr The CAADP 2020 biennial review: Why many countries are off-track
title_full_unstemmed The CAADP 2020 biennial review: Why many countries are off-track
title_short The CAADP 2020 biennial review: Why many countries are off-track
title_sort caadp 2020 biennial review why many countries are off track
topic agricultural sector
covid-19
indicators
caadp
agriculture
benchmarks
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142079
work_keys_str_mv AT beninsamuel thecaadp2020biennialreviewwhymanycountriesareofftrack
AT beninsamuel caadp2020biennialreviewwhymanycountriesareofftrack