Africa’s litigated democracy

The fact that African opposition parties increasingly turn to the courts when they lose elections indicates that perceptions of judicial independence are improving. But frequent recourse to the courts can undermine trust in the electoral process and indicates that basic democratic mechanisms are not...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Baulch, Bob, Resnick, Danielle
Format: Opinion Piece
Language:Inglés
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142046
_version_ 1855536317034659840
author Baulch, Bob
Resnick, Danielle
author_browse Baulch, Bob
Resnick, Danielle
author_facet Baulch, Bob
Resnick, Danielle
author_sort Baulch, Bob
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description The fact that African opposition parties increasingly turn to the courts when they lose elections indicates that perceptions of judicial independence are improving. But frequent recourse to the courts can undermine trust in the electoral process and indicates that basic democratic mechanisms are not functioning properly.
format Opinion Piece
id CGSpace142046
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1420462024-10-25T08:04:21Z Africa’s litigated democracy Baulch, Bob Resnick, Danielle courts democracy judicial separation governance The fact that African opposition parties increasingly turn to the courts when they lose elections indicates that perceptions of judicial independence are improving. But frequent recourse to the courts can undermine trust in the electoral process and indicates that basic democratic mechanisms are not functioning properly. 2020-02-27 2024-05-22T12:09:52Z 2024-05-22T12:09:52Z Opinion Piece https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142046 en Open Access Baulch, Bob; and Resnick, Danielle. 2020. Africa’s litigated democracy. Project Syndicate. First published online on February 27, 2020. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/africa-presidential-election-reruns-four-lessons-by-bob-baulch-and-danielle-resnick-2020-02
spellingShingle courts
democracy
judicial separation
governance
Baulch, Bob
Resnick, Danielle
Africa’s litigated democracy
title Africa’s litigated democracy
title_full Africa’s litigated democracy
title_fullStr Africa’s litigated democracy
title_full_unstemmed Africa’s litigated democracy
title_short Africa’s litigated democracy
title_sort africa s litigated democracy
topic courts
democracy
judicial separation
governance
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/142046
work_keys_str_mv AT baulchbob africaslitigateddemocracy
AT resnickdanielle africaslitigateddemocracy