Are farm input subsidies a disincentive for integrated pest management adoption? evidence from Zambia
Input subsidy programmes (ISPs) remain a popular but contentious policy tool to promote agricultural intensification, food security and poverty reduction across Africa. Although previous studies have explored the impact of ISPs on various smallholder outcomes, no studies have analysed the impact of...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
Wiley
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/141733 |
Ejemplares similares: Are farm input subsidies a disincentive for integrated pest management adoption? evidence from Zambia
- Are farm input subsidies a disincentive for integrated pest management adoption? Evidence from Zambia
- Promoting adoption of push-pull technology among maize farmers in Uganda
- Gender, communication and within-village input supply in IPM adoption: Policy lessons from an impact evaluation study in Uganda
- The use of interval censored data to assess the timing of early field infestation of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in maize fields
- Integrating greener, sustainable management tactics to minimise fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) damage in maize
- Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) management using pheromone-based mass trapping data on summer maize at the PHI platform in Qob Elisa, Lebanon