The cost and cost-effectiveness of an integrated wasting prevention and screening intervention package in Burkina Faso and Mali

Background Little is known about costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions that integrate wasting prevention into screening for child wasting. Objective This study’s objective was to estimate the cost and cost-effectiveness of an intervention that integrated behavior change communication (BCC)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brander, Rebecca L., Puett, Chloe, Becquey, Elodie, Leroy, Jef L., Ruel, Marie T., Sessou, Fidele Eric, Huybregts, Lieven
Formato: Journal Article
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Elsevier 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10568/141522
_version_ 1855529414194888704
author Brander, Rebecca L.
Puett, Chloe
Becquey, Elodie
Leroy, Jef L.
Ruel, Marie T.
Sessou, Fidele Eric
Huybregts, Lieven
author_browse Becquey, Elodie
Brander, Rebecca L.
Huybregts, Lieven
Leroy, Jef L.
Puett, Chloe
Ruel, Marie T.
Sessou, Fidele Eric
author_facet Brander, Rebecca L.
Puett, Chloe
Becquey, Elodie
Leroy, Jef L.
Ruel, Marie T.
Sessou, Fidele Eric
Huybregts, Lieven
author_sort Brander, Rebecca L.
collection Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (CGSpace)
description Background Little is known about costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions that integrate wasting prevention into screening for child wasting. Objective This study’s objective was to estimate the cost and cost-effectiveness of an intervention that integrated behavior change communication (BCC) and small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNS) into platforms for wasting screening in Burkina Faso (a facility-based platform, where BCC was enhanced compared to standard care) and Mali (a community-based platform, with standard BCC). Methods Activity-based costing was used to estimate the cost per child-contact for the intervention and the comparison group, which did not receive the intervention. Costs were ascertained from accounting records, interviews, surveys, and observations. The number of child-contacts were calculated using population size estimates and average attendance rates for each service. Costs per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted were estimated using a Markov model populated with data from the parent trials on impact on wasting incidence and treatment coverage. Results In the intervention group in Burkina Faso, the cost per child-contact of facility-based screening was $0.85, of enhanced BCC was $4.28, and of SQ-LNS was $8.86. In Mali, the cost per child-contact of community-based screening was $0.57, of standard BCC was $0.72, and of SQ-LNS was $4.14. Although no SQ-LNS costs were incurred in the comparison groups (hence lower total costs), costs per child-contact for screening and BCC were higher because coverage of these services was lower. The intervention package cost $1,073 per DALY averted in Burkina Faso and $747 in Mali. Conclusions Integration of wasting prevention into screening for child wasting led to higher total costs but lower unit costs than standard screening due to increased coverage. Greater cost-effectiveness could be achieved if BCC were strengthened and led to improved caregiver health and nutrition practices and if screening triggered appropriate use of services and higher treatment coverage.
format Journal Article
id CGSpace141522
institution CGIAR Consortium
language Inglés
publishDate 2024
publishDateRange 2024
publishDateSort 2024
publisher Elsevier
publisherStr Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling CGSpace1415222025-04-08T18:26:31Z The cost and cost-effectiveness of an integrated wasting prevention and screening intervention package in Burkina Faso and Mali Brander, Rebecca L. Puett, Chloe Becquey, Elodie Leroy, Jef L. Ruel, Marie T. Sessou, Fidele Eric Huybregts, Lieven malnutrition wasting disease (nutritional disorder) economic value cost analysis screening supplementary feeding lipids Background Little is known about costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions that integrate wasting prevention into screening for child wasting. Objective This study’s objective was to estimate the cost and cost-effectiveness of an intervention that integrated behavior change communication (BCC) and small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNS) into platforms for wasting screening in Burkina Faso (a facility-based platform, where BCC was enhanced compared to standard care) and Mali (a community-based platform, with standard BCC). Methods Activity-based costing was used to estimate the cost per child-contact for the intervention and the comparison group, which did not receive the intervention. Costs were ascertained from accounting records, interviews, surveys, and observations. The number of child-contacts were calculated using population size estimates and average attendance rates for each service. Costs per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted were estimated using a Markov model populated with data from the parent trials on impact on wasting incidence and treatment coverage. Results In the intervention group in Burkina Faso, the cost per child-contact of facility-based screening was $0.85, of enhanced BCC was $4.28, and of SQ-LNS was $8.86. In Mali, the cost per child-contact of community-based screening was $0.57, of standard BCC was $0.72, and of SQ-LNS was $4.14. Although no SQ-LNS costs were incurred in the comparison groups (hence lower total costs), costs per child-contact for screening and BCC were higher because coverage of these services was lower. The intervention package cost $1,073 per DALY averted in Burkina Faso and $747 in Mali. Conclusions Integration of wasting prevention into screening for child wasting led to higher total costs but lower unit costs than standard screening due to increased coverage. Greater cost-effectiveness could be achieved if BCC were strengthened and led to improved caregiver health and nutrition practices and if screening triggered appropriate use of services and higher treatment coverage. 2024-08 2024-04-18T15:43:26Z 2024-04-18T15:43:26Z Journal Article https://hdl.handle.net/10568/141522 en https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.102929 Open Access Elsevier Brander, Rebecca L.; Puett, Chloe; Becquey, Elodie; Leroy, Jef L.; Ruel, Marie T.; Sessou, Fidele Eric; and Huybregts, Lieven. 2024. The cost and cost-effectiveness of an integrated wasting prevention and screening intervention package in Burkina Faso and Mali. Journal of Nutrition 154(8): 2551-2565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.04.010
spellingShingle malnutrition
wasting disease (nutritional disorder)
economic value
cost analysis
screening
supplementary feeding
lipids
Brander, Rebecca L.
Puett, Chloe
Becquey, Elodie
Leroy, Jef L.
Ruel, Marie T.
Sessou, Fidele Eric
Huybregts, Lieven
The cost and cost-effectiveness of an integrated wasting prevention and screening intervention package in Burkina Faso and Mali
title The cost and cost-effectiveness of an integrated wasting prevention and screening intervention package in Burkina Faso and Mali
title_full The cost and cost-effectiveness of an integrated wasting prevention and screening intervention package in Burkina Faso and Mali
title_fullStr The cost and cost-effectiveness of an integrated wasting prevention and screening intervention package in Burkina Faso and Mali
title_full_unstemmed The cost and cost-effectiveness of an integrated wasting prevention and screening intervention package in Burkina Faso and Mali
title_short The cost and cost-effectiveness of an integrated wasting prevention and screening intervention package in Burkina Faso and Mali
title_sort cost and cost effectiveness of an integrated wasting prevention and screening intervention package in burkina faso and mali
topic malnutrition
wasting disease (nutritional disorder)
economic value
cost analysis
screening
supplementary feeding
lipids
url https://hdl.handle.net/10568/141522
work_keys_str_mv AT branderrebeccal thecostandcosteffectivenessofanintegratedwastingpreventionandscreeninginterventionpackageinburkinafasoandmali
AT puettchloe thecostandcosteffectivenessofanintegratedwastingpreventionandscreeninginterventionpackageinburkinafasoandmali
AT becqueyelodie thecostandcosteffectivenessofanintegratedwastingpreventionandscreeninginterventionpackageinburkinafasoandmali
AT leroyjefl thecostandcosteffectivenessofanintegratedwastingpreventionandscreeninginterventionpackageinburkinafasoandmali
AT ruelmariet thecostandcosteffectivenessofanintegratedwastingpreventionandscreeninginterventionpackageinburkinafasoandmali
AT sessoufideleeric thecostandcosteffectivenessofanintegratedwastingpreventionandscreeninginterventionpackageinburkinafasoandmali
AT huybregtslieven thecostandcosteffectivenessofanintegratedwastingpreventionandscreeninginterventionpackageinburkinafasoandmali
AT branderrebeccal costandcosteffectivenessofanintegratedwastingpreventionandscreeninginterventionpackageinburkinafasoandmali
AT puettchloe costandcosteffectivenessofanintegratedwastingpreventionandscreeninginterventionpackageinburkinafasoandmali
AT becqueyelodie costandcosteffectivenessofanintegratedwastingpreventionandscreeninginterventionpackageinburkinafasoandmali
AT leroyjefl costandcosteffectivenessofanintegratedwastingpreventionandscreeninginterventionpackageinburkinafasoandmali
AT ruelmariet costandcosteffectivenessofanintegratedwastingpreventionandscreeninginterventionpackageinburkinafasoandmali
AT sessoufideleeric costandcosteffectivenessofanintegratedwastingpreventionandscreeninginterventionpackageinburkinafasoandmali
AT huybregtslieven costandcosteffectivenessofanintegratedwastingpreventionandscreeninginterventionpackageinburkinafasoandmali